Umbridge's Rape (Was: Is Umbridge a Half-Breed???)
jsmgleaner
jsmgleaner at yahoo.com
Wed Aug 20 22:24:34 UTC 2003
No: HPFGUIDX 78186
> Laura:
> First, in my original post asking for ideas on punishments for
> Umbridge, I did make it clear that any punishment imposed should be
> *after* a public trial. If the WW didn't learn anything else last
> time around, I hope that they learned that in the realm of law, the
> ends do NOT justify the means. Corrupt procedure leads to corrupt
> results-just ask Sirius (if you can find him...sigh).
Me:
That was part of my main point in the post, but I think I was responding to a lot
of one-liner threads about Umbridge, not your original (sorry for the
confusion). But I think, moreover, that what OOtP reminds us is that unjust
laws can be passed and that legal systems do not necessarily mean justice,
even in the WW. What if the trial just has to be a show trial? What if they
made torture legal (or maybe torture is legal?)? I was trying to tease out the
ethics involved in punishment, made very grey in the book by MoM's
treatment of Harry and the weird centaur trauma and public humiliation of
Umbridge.
Laura again: [snip]
> Third, you won't find a more dedicated feminist than me out there,
> but the reality is that some women are bad people. If the entire
> spectrum of human behavior doesn't apply to us, we aren't really
> human, are we? [snip]
Me again:
I actually thought the Umbridge character was terrific for the narrative,
especially compared to other villains in the series (and I would never ask
anyone to pull out their feminist credentials). Stylistically, though, I thought it
was a bit too much at the end with JKR practically saying "Look Umbridge is *
really* evil" with Umbridge about to use the AK curse on Harry and having set
the demnetors on him -- like the finale rack of a fireworks display. And I
thought Umbridge appeared much sneakier and smarter than that; I would
have preferred a more subtle approach. And, at times, I did find it annoying
that Umbridge is depicted as so ugly and so evil. I'm in the middle of reading
Dickens right now, and I have to say that it is too stock Victorian, but then
again I have argued elsewhere that these novels are very Victorian in their
plot structures and characterization. Which leads back to the question of the
centaurs' violence. I was amazed by the suggestion of rape because once I
thought about it, the language was very similar to how this would be obliquely
hinted at in eighteenth and nineteenth century literature, particularly in
captivity narratives.
--jsmgleaner
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive