Some discrepancies
justcarol67
justcarol67 at yahoo.com
Mon Dec 8 06:13:33 UTC 2003
No: HPFGUIDX 86697
-> Sylvia wrote:
> > The most likely explanation for Mrs. Black's proprietorial
> > references to her ancient house is that it is, indeed, her
> > ancient house. <snip>
>
> Carol:
> Any canon to support that, or just Mrs. Black's fanaticism
> and use of "my" instead of "our" or "my husband's"? My theory of
> the moment is still that Mrs. Black was insanely fixated with her
> husband's family, which she regarded as hers, but I'm willing to
> reconsider if the evidence is strong enough. We don't have any
> evidence of cousins marrying cousins with the same last name, only
> Black/Malfoy, Black/Lestrange, Black/Tonks (definitely not within
> the little circle), and Potter/Evans.
>
>
Karen:
I have just been rereading OOP and this struck me.
"I haven't looked at this for years. There's Phineas Nigellus... my
great-great-grandfather, see? Least popular headmaster Hogwarts ever
had...and Araminta Meliflua...cousin of my mother's...tried to force
through a Ministry Bill to make Muggle-hunting legal..."
Pg 113 of the US version.
This says to me that the House of Black comes from Sirius's mom or
she did indeed marry into her own family for her cousin to be on the
family tree.
Carol:
Thanks for catching that, Karen. Clearly Mrs. Black *is* talking about
her own ancestry (as well as her husband's since it's "the House of
Black"), but I don't think we need to have her marrying her own first
cousin to explain it. More likely we just have both sides of Sirius's
family represented in the tapestry.
The fact that Phineas is Sirius's great-great-grandfather but has a
different last name does indicate that he's not Sirius's father's
father's grandfather, but there are seven other possibilities, four on
Sirius's mother's side and three on his father's (everyone has eight
great-great-grandfathers). Phineas's presence suggests to me that even
though the tapestry was identified as "The Noble and Most Ancient
House of Black," it shows the ancestors (and close living relatives)
of both Mr. and Mrs. Black, which would explain Mrs. Black's
possessiveness and references to "her" family without necessitating
her marrying a cousin with the same last name. (Narcissa and Bellatrix
would be cousins on the father's side, according to my theory, but
still part of Mrs. Black's "family" as pureblood relatives of her
husband. Phineas, OTOH, could well be her own ancestor, but is still
part of the "House of Black" through his connection to her.)
Having not only Phineas but a definite maternal relative, Araminta
Melliflua, on the tapestry pretty much destroys my theory that the
Potter and Snape families don't show up because they're on Sirius's
mother's side of the family, but it's still possible that the Potter
or Snape connections were so far back that their presence on the
tapestry they would require some diligent searching to discover
(assuming that the names had not been removed). It would be rather
time-consuming and laborious to search for ancestors from more than a
few generations back, simply because the tapestry must have been so
huge and so crowded. It's quite possible that Sirius, who was not
obsessed with blood relationships, never made the effort to explore it
thoroughly and consequently was unaware of his exact relationship to
the Potter and Snape families, or he could have chosen not to mention
the connection(s) to Harry.
Carol, who still thinks that the three families must be related
because of the small number of pure blood families
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive