Avaricious Fudge?
jotwo2003
jsummerill at summerillj.freeserve.co.uk
Tue Dec 30 16:11:48 UTC 2003
No: HPFGUIDX 87787
Re-reading OOP I've had a few thoughts about Fudge. Even though by
the end he had been forced to accept that Voldemort was back I think
he is going to cause more trouble for the good side in the next
books. (I think this is my own theory but I've read so many
discussions in fandom that sometimes I'm not sure where ideas comes
from.)
Now I don't believe Fudge is a Death Eater. At the end of GOF I
considered him as an incompetent who was sticking his head in the
sand. (BTW I think his incompetence is verified by his name, as to
fudge carries overtones of putting together something inadequate.)
In OOP we saw that he was devious, as he was prepared to use
character assassination to undermine people who disagreed with him.
I also think that OOP planted the idea that Fudge is avaricious. I
picked this up by re-reading Chapter 10, Luna Lovegood, specifically
The Quibbler article.
"Cornelius Fudge, the Minister for Magic, denied he had any plans to
take over the running of the Wizarding Bank, Gringotts, when he was
elected Minister for Magic five years ago. Fudge has always insisted
that he wants nothing more than to 'co-operate peacefully' with the
guardians of our gold.
BUT DOES HE?
Sources close to the Minister have recently disclosed that
Fudge's dearest ambition is to seize control of the goblin gold
supplies and that he will not hesitate to use force if need be
"
Now, I know The Quibbler has been presented in canon as the sort of
newspaper that makes the National Enquirer look like the Financial
Times, but I get the impression that fans suspect that there may be a
kernel of truth in some of its outrageous stories.
I can envisage Fudge doing something like this, as it would be a
logical character development for him, as we know now he is an
incompetent but ruthless politician, rather than the avuncular
bumbler the reader and Harry first took him to be. From OOP the
reader gets the impression that JKR dislikes bureaucrats and
politicians, and it would be logical if she developed this idea by
portraying the wizarding government as corrupt and venal.
If Fudge attacks the goblins for their gold then it would make sense
for them to join Voldemort's side, or, at best, refuse to help the
good side.
There is other evidence to support this theory. In OOP, chapter 5,
The order of the Phoenix, Bill says Ragnak is feeling anti-wizard
because Fudge refused to pay the goblins the money that Ludo Bagman
owed them in GOF. Perhaps this is another example of JKR's
foreshadowing technique.
Other techniques that people argue that she uses when she is planting
a clue are interruption and Harry not believing something. With
regards to The Quibbler article, JKR writes, "Harry did not read any
further. Fudge might have many faults but Harry found it extremely
hard to imagine him ordering goblins to be cooked in pies."
Fudge won't be going that far but I suspect something will happen
between him and the goblins.
JoTwo
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive