Not Slytherin, not Slytherin
joywitch_m_curmudgeon <joym999@aol.com>
joym999 at aol.com
Sat Feb 1 17:30:28 UTC 2003
No: HPFGUIDX 51363
--- In HPforGrownups at yahoogroups.com, jazmyn <jazmyn at p...> wrote:
> There is no canon to support the idea that all Slytherins are
purebreds.
> Tom Riddle was not a pureblood and the sorting hat wanted to put
Harry
> in Slytherin and he is not pureblood either.
I agree that there's no canon to support that all Slytherins are
purebloods, but I also think that very few wizards really are
purebloods. I've always assumed that the whole pureblood thing was
an allusion to "people" like Hitler, who claimed that the "Aryan
race" was superior but who wasn't Aryan himself. In fact, the whole
Aryan thing, as well as most definitions of "race", is fairly vague
and hard to define.
Most people can't possibly know if their ancestors are "pure" black,
white, Irish, Chinese, Jewish, French, Eskimo, or anything else. In
reality, the whole idea of a "pure" race of any sort is ridiculous,
which is one of the many reasons why racial prejudice is ridiculous.
Anyway, I think that the whole "pureblood" wizard thing is supposed
to be as absurd and undefinable as the muggle sort, hence the
constant questions about what, exactly, constitutes a "pureblood."
--Joywitch
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive