Snape's anger and redemption (was: agent in SS)
pippin_999 <foxmoth@qnet.com>
foxmoth at qnet.com
Sat Feb 15 17:48:02 UTC 2003
No: HPFGUIDX 52293
Melody said:
>> And as much as people want to sugar coat Snape and keep
him away from all the "bad" things the DE's do, frankly you are
cheapening his redemption. For what is redemption anyway, if
you have never done anything wrong?<<
This has come up a couple of times lately, this idea that only evil
characters need redemption, or that redemption only "bangs" if
the characters are evil.
The thing is, people don't get redeemed from evil. They get
rescued from evil (hopefully). What they get redeemed from is
*sin.* There are a lot of definitions but in my tradition anyway,
sin is often thought of as a narrow place, some place so small
there's only room in it for you and your troubles.
In terms of the Potterverse, it could be a snake's body, or a
dungeon lined with jars full of unspeakable things, or a train
corridor, or a purple turban. But it could also be a toilet stall,
or a tiny room lined with posters of a losing team, or even a
cupboard under the stairs. A character doesn't have to be evil to
need redemption, to need a path out of the narrow place. What
Quirrell lost sight of when he came to believe there is no good
and evil, is that the path exists.
Harry has never murdered anybody, but when he intervenes to
save Pettigrew, he redeems himself from the blind anger that
blew up Aunt Marge. He moves out of the narrow place. He does
it, traditionally enough, by recognizing a higher power. He does
what he thinks his father would have wanted.
Since we're talking about characters, not people, it's irrelevant
whether Snape ever murdered. He was a servant of Voldemort.
We and Dumbledore know those who serve Voldemort are
willing to kill, torture and enslave for no reason except that their
master commands it. Snape, though he longs for a reason to
kill Sirius, and IMO does his damnedest to provoke Sirius into
giving him one, appears no longer willing to kill except in
self-defense.
Snape's anger is now limited to verbal assaults, and this is less
evil because it's usually less damaging, but his anger is not
necessarily less. Evil, you could say, is about how sin looks
from the outside. It's a judgement about the threat, not the
sinfulness.
Pippin
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive