Kiddie Lit? (was More Ginny, Hermione and the Curse of Mary Sue
Julie (a.k.a. Viola) <viola_1895@yahoo.com>
viola_1895 at yahoo.com
Thu Feb 20 05:08:22 UTC 2003
No: HPFGUIDX 52565
--- In HPforGrownups at yahoogroups.com, Penny Linsenmayer
> It's just that the phrases "well, these are *just* kids' books so
X, Y and Z naturally won't happen," or "even in a kids' book" - well,
they tend to set me off a bit is all. I think JKR has typically
turned things on their head ...... so I don't know why classifying
the books as "childrens' books" automatically means that certain plot
points *won't* happen. I think that's selling JKR short a bit myself.
Well, that's certainly not the subtext that I intended when I said
they were books written for kids. I still think they are young adult
novels (Rowling both uses and reinvents the tropes of young adult
adventure novels and boarding school tales all over the place) but I
wouldn't suggest that that means a particular plot development will
or won't happen. In fact, the point of my original post was that I
thought it was significant that imagery *not* typically associated
with a YA novel was present in CoS.
And other people may not view the books as being written primarily
for younger readers and that's an equally valid interpretation.
*shrugs* I don't think, though, that classifying the books
as "children's" or "young adult" literature takes anything *away*
from them. There are plenty of novels that I would argue were written
with young adults in mind that have an equally compelling adult
reading as well: the Narnia books and A Wrinkle in Time spring
immediately to mind, and I'm sure there are others. But, for me at
least, a critical part of the adult reading of those books is a
knowledge that they're intended for and illuminate things about
childhood and young adulthood.
--Julie
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive