Responses to S.N.O.T., detailed analysis of Snape's feelings toward Harry
Diana <dianasdolls@yahoo.com>
dianasdolls at yahoo.com
Sat Jan 4 09:40:03 UTC 2003
No: HPFGUIDX 49184
I must apologize for sending my response to the list the first time
without a title. I beg the list's forgiveness for sending this long
thing twice - I did want it be properly Titled. I accidentally hit
the Enter key before typing the title. Sorry.
And I'm doubly sorry for those on digest like myself. :{
Thanks for all the interesting responses! It's been fascinating
reading different perspectives on Snape attitude to Harry.
I've got some additional statements to explain some misconceptions
about my original post on S.N.O.T.
First off, I do not hate Snape. I am intrigued by the character as
much as the next person. I, too, wonder what caused him to give up
his support of Voldemort and gain Dumbledore's trust. Snape, like
every character in the book is an integral part of Harry's
experience at Hogwarts, `warts' and all, to use a pun. Thankfully,
no one has flamed me off list for my post about Snape, but I do
believe that Snape is NOT a nice person. Whatever he might do in
future books to help/hinder/annoy/etc. Harry and his friends, it
does not mean he will suddenly be Mr. Nice-Guy.
Second, I do not believe that Lily and James Potter were saints.
Sirius and Lupin have both told Harry some traits that they and his
father shared that, in hindsight, they aren't so proud of creating
the Maurader's Map for one example. From what canon we do have on
James, we do know he relished being a sort of scoundrel [Han Solo,
anyone? :D], like Fred and George, but without, apparently, getting
caught. He knowingly abetted and even accompanied a werewolf to run
loose in Hogsmeade while still a student in school. Even Lupin and
Sirius look back on that and can't believe how dangerous and stupid
they were for doing that. James even kept his animagus form secret
from Dumbledore after graduating a wizard he remained close to
even after leaving Hogwarts. Lily is more sketchy as we've not
received much info regarding her character when she was at Hogwarts
or afterwards, but I seriously doubt she was a saint.
I wrote: Snape was jealous of James' popularity, skill at Quidditch
and
his small group of close-knit friends, all of which Harry now has at
Hogwart?s. Even twelve years after James' death, Snape says,
sneeringly, "...a little talent on the Quidditch field..." with great
derision while interrogating Harry after Harry's head was seen by
Malfoy in Hogsmeade [PoA]. He even attributes "strutting" to James,
and to Harry, though nothing in canon suggests that James actually
strutted around the school."
Jim Ferer wrote:
See? Any sign of popularity, success, or confidence is hateful to
Snape. Confidence, self-worth, comfort in one's skin is bound to look
like "strutting" to someone like Snape.
My response:
Since we're never shown in the books Snape's treatment of other
popular students in his classes besides Harry specifically, I have
no canon to support my belief that Snape doesn't treat other popular
students like he treats Harry. Granted Harry is mind-bogglingly
famous, but still
Snape does love to rub Harry's fame in his face.
Oryomai wrote:
Can anyone honestly say that they never hated the
people who had everything? (If you think you can, then you were one
of the people with everything *grin*) I know I can't. You twist
reality in your mind so that these people are keeping you down, and
you deserve the glory.
I respond:
I can honestly say that I didn't hate those popular kids in school.
I wasn't part of the popular crowd, either. I graduated from high
school 19 years ago this year and I can't even remember most of
those popular kids names, let alone fathom keeping alive a deep-
seated hatred of any of them just because they were popular and I
wasn't so many years ago. I would guess that most people thinking
back on school are the same way as me
am I right?
I had written:
"Snape can¡¦t understand this and sees Harry¡¦s rule-breaking as
Harry
proclaiming how special and famous he is ¡Vso special and famous he
won¡¦t be punished for breaking rules."
Oryomai responded:
I agree with Snape there. I personally cannot stand people who break
the rules and get ahead, while those of us who follow get nowhere.
No one is above the rules. Period. Now, I disagree with you on
the "can vs. must". Harry doesn't *have* to do anything, he chooses
to. Hence, can wins to me.
Acire responded:
It is proclaiming how special Harry is, if we go with your theory.
If Harry is allowed to break rules because it's his natural
tendency, I would hate him too. IIRC (I know I'm using that phrase a
lot), most of the times harry gets punished by Snape (with the
exception of the escape of Sirius), it's because he is breaking a
rule for no reason, such as the flying car incident, sneaking into
Hogsmeade, or wandering around Hogwarts at night. He's not supposed
to do any of this things, and he has *no reason* to do them. Even DD
threatened to expel Harry after the car, and Harry was just lucky
Lupin saved the day after
the Hogsmeade incident. Snape thinks that Harry's head is so big
that he believes rules are above him, as he states in PoA, after
Malfoy catches him in Hogsmeade. Harry is breaking the rules
knowingly, not because he thinks he's special, but because he is
being selfish, as in Hogsmead, or not thinking, as in the flying car.
I respond:
Here is where we disagree completely. Harry *must* break the rules
in the climaxes of the books his character won't allow any other
possibility. Harry could not live with himself if he didn't pursue
what was right, even at the cost of his life. He is afraid when he
goes through the obstacles and while facing Quirrell in the search
for the Sorcerer's Stone. He is afraid when he goes into the
Chamber of Secrets to try to save Ginny's life, even though he
doesn't "see how Ginny could possibly be still alive" at that point
in the story. When he confronts Sirius and then Lupin in the
Shrieking Shack, he didn't end up there because he was looking for
Sirius, he ended up there because he thought Ron was going to get
eaten by a giant dog if he and Hermione didn't save him! He spent
the entire fourth book afraid of being attacked, killed, embarrassed
in front the whole school, failing to measure up to other's
expectations, you name it!
When Harry does flout the rules, such as going into Hogsmeade
without permission, for example, he is being strong-willed, stubborn
and, quite frankly, naughty. Look at Draco by comparison, he was up
late wandering around the school in PS/SS and called attention to
that fact from McGonagall just so he could get H/H/R in trouble.
Sure, Harry visits Hagrid at odd times, many times without
permission, but he's doing it because he loves Hagrid and needs his
advice and support and/or is trying to provide emotional support for
Hagrid when Hagrid when he needs it. Because the books are written
entirely from Harry's point of view, us readers get to see what
motivates Harry to do the things he does.
Harry doesn't get punished for doing those things because, let's be
frank, he's either just saved someone's life, saved the school or
been falsely accused. When Harry has been caught for minor rule
breaking he does get punished, McGonagall gives him detention &
takes points from Gryffindor and Flitwick gave him extra Charms
homework in GoF.
As for the flying car incident, Ron, as a lifetime member of the
wizarding community, really should have known better on that one,
but, in their defense, they are both only 12 year old boys. What
boy wouldn't want to take a flying car to school? :D of flying a
car to Hogwarts.
Harry does get special treatment from Dumbledore and McGonagall, but
that is because they have their own reasons for doing so.
McGonagall is head of Gryffindor house and, when mightily pushed to
the edge, will take lots of points from H/H/R, but, obviously, won't
punish him by removing him from the Quidditch team she wants
Gryffindor house to win the house cup too much! Dumbledore
obviously knows something about Harry that we've not been let in on,
whether it's some prophecy about his defeat of Voldemort or
?
Dumbledore has his reasons and bends rules accordingly. Fudge
saying that "
well, we all have a soft spot where Harry is
concerned..." is accurate in the wizarding world, but not for the
teachers at Hogwarts, IMO. Harry does not regard this special
treatment by the wizarding world as a "good thing". His reaction to
being a celebrity is to run from it as fast a possible.
Snape may think Harry has a big head swelled by his fame, but he
doesn't. Harry doesn't act like a *famous* person [Gilderoy
Lockhart, anyone?]. He has only two close friends with which he
shares everything at school, but that's it. He is kind of
emotionally distant from everyone else. He doesn't *want* to be
famous and would prefer to sink into anonymity, but has finally
accepted by the end of GoF that that is never going to happen.
Bobby responded:
All of a sudden, along comes the son of one of the chief pranksters,
one of the people he hated in school. The boy looks like his father
and from the start is a celebrity. He begins to get away with all
the things the father did. History repeats itself. Snape responds in
an
inappropriate manner but one that psychology speaking is right for
him.
I reply:
I agree, but only in that that response may be pyschologically right
for Snape, but only Snape. IMO, Snape is not separating Harry as
person from Snape's interpretation/recollection of James. In the
real world, Snape would be getting some serious counseling. Harry
never even knew his father, so blaming him for being like him is
absurd, but Snape persists anyway.
I'll respond to some more replies in another post as this one is too
long already.
Diana
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive