Dumbledore's employment policy (WAS: Characters You Hate)

[lindseyharrisst <lindseyharrisst@hotmail.com>]

No: HPFGUIDX 51177


> > Tom ads:
> > I agree that Dumbledore wasn't thorough enough. I often thought to 
> > myself that, with one requested charm Dumbledore could have 
> > disqualified Lockhart - provided it wasn't a memory charm.
> > 
> > And there was a better choice - Dumbledore himself. When I was in 
> > school, the Headmaster had to fill in for teachers more than once 
> > because there was no substitute available.
> > 
> > And even if it taxed Dumbledore's time a little, it would have been a 
> > better choice than having that idiot teaching such an important 
> > class - for all intents and purposes that ENTIRE year of DADA was 
> > wasted.
> > 
> > -Tom
> 
See Greywolf, I have supportersand loyal allies *g*! I really do think
we are both getting too much out of the spirit of cannon now, what
with all the discussion of hiring procedures we know nothing about.
All we can say for sure is that if what you have at the end of a year
is competantly taught children then you have hired correctly and your
procedure works and if not then you have not and it does n't. 

nuh nuh na nuh nuh can't say it back!
lol, Snapesangel (who is nothing if not persistant)