House points and Dumbledore
Erica <cymru1ca@yahoo.ca>
cymru1ca at yahoo.ca
Fri Jan 31 01:42:33 UTC 2003
No: HPFGUIDX 51198
--- In HPforGrownups at yahoogroups.com, "Scott Northrup" <snorth at u...>
wrote:
> Ah, once again, I match wits with Tom again. (by the way, you made
good
> points in your last "Snape is rational" post; I'm done with that
topic
> however; I think the rest of the group must be sick of me by now)
>
> Your point made me wonder how hard catching the key really was, at
first (I
> had thought about it before). But, we've seen that Quirrel is not
an
> incompetent wizard, and he has Voldemort's power backing him.
>
> What am I talking about? You only assume that Quirrel actually
used a broom
> to catch the key! I don't think it would be a stretch to say he
pointed his
> wand at the big fat silver key, and said "ACCIO" and the key flew
into his
> hand.
>
> That's not too much of a stretch, is it?
>
> -Scott
> (of course, that would make me agree with Tom on this point: that
particular
> challenge was a 'lame' one. All it takes is some outside-the-box
thinking.
> Not seeing the broomsticks, and assuming that the only way to catch
the key
> was to use a broomstick)
I suspect that objects that are under some kind of enchantment
(flying keys) may not be susceptible to 'Accio' - I mean, it would
make for a very boring Quidditch match, wouldn't it? (Accio Snitch!)
Erica
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive