muggle baiting vs. muggle torture

Stacy Patnode kaylee01 at woh.rr.com
Wed Jan 8 09:53:37 UTC 2003


No: HPFGUIDX 155738

Irene:
>But if Dudley waited a bit longer to eat this sweet, if Arthur was >not still 
>around, Dudley would be dead. Does not get more harmful than that.
>They had no way to predict when Dudley will eat it.
>>

Stacy responds:
Ah, but knowing Dudley as we do, I believe the twins were quite safe in 
predicting that poor sweet-deprived Dudley couldn't resist pouncing 
immediately on the brightly wrapped toffees after a summer of grapefruit and 
"rabbit food."
I can't find any examples in the books to support a theory that any of Fred 
and George's pranks are deadly.  Fred and George were defending their "ickle 
brother" Harry from his bullying cousin, not intentionally seeking out a 
muggle to torment.
I believe that Dudley was in more danger from being smothered by Petunia, 
throwing herself on top of him and yanking on his tongue, than he was from 
the toffee.
Stacy







More information about the HPforGrownups archive