OOP - Veritaserum
pk_dawson
wcdawson at optonline.net
Thu Jul 3 00:07:42 UTC 2003
No: HPFGUIDX 66904
--- In HPforGrownups at yahoogroups.com, "Andrea" <crawford1270 at y...>
wrote:
> S
> P
> O
> I
> L
> E
> R
> S
> P
> A
> C
> E
>
>
> Does anyone else wonder why Harry was not just given Veritaserum by
> the ministry in lieu of his sham of a hearing? Aside from the
> obviously ploy by the ministry to find him guilty and get him out of
> the way regardless of of the rules? I find it odd that Dumbledore
> would parade a dubious witness (At least in the MOM's eyes) that
they
> could easily find fault with instead of offering the path of least
> resistance...aka let Harry drink the serum and satisfy the members
of
> the jury. For that matter, why did they not administer the serum to
> Harry at the end of GoF, to verify his version of events to the
> ministry, thus ensuring them that LV had returned to power??
>
> Just Wondering,
> Andrea ( who doesn't really care WHAT JKR decides to write...as long
> as she continues to do so...:)
My best guess is that Veritaserum has some sort of nasty side
effect(s), which is one of the reasons why it is so restricted. But
maybe this is something of a Flint, because then why wasn't it used at
the Death Eater trials we saw in GoF? *shrug* Dumbledore certainly
didn't seem to doubt its effectiveness, even on a powerful dark wizard
like Crouch.
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive