The Elf Problem
B Arrowsmith
arrowsmithbt at btconnect.com
Thu Jul 3 15:22:19 UTC 2003
No: HPFGUIDX 67072
There have been so many posts over the past few weeks that I have to
admit, to my shame, that I haven't had the time to read them all. So if
I've nicked your arguments, sorry; it's through ignorance, not bad
manners.
Elves are a problem; at least they are since JKR threw a Jarvey amongst
the Gnomes. Rights, wrongs and obligations flash across the message
boards; sound and fury assault the senses. Principled stand vs Well,
they're only fictional. Allegory vs morality. Hmm.
O.K. What is an Elf? Should be easy to answer, just look it up in
Scamangers FB&WTFT...... Oh, ah.
No mention. Not even in the "What is a Beast?" section. Centaurs, yes,
Goblins, yes, Merpeople, yes, Elves, forget it - None, zero, zippo,
zilch. Well, there is 'Erkling - an elfish creature that likes eating
children.'
We have three memorable, plot affecting characters with NO background,
in a series renowned for its detailed documentation. Does no-one find
this gaping chasm significant? We're missing something folks, something
important.
If JKR tells us nothing, we're thrown back onto our own devices.
Elf. In traditional European Lore Elves were male. (Fairies were the
female equivalent.) They do not have a good reputation - usually
mischievous, often spiteful or malign. Most diseases of cattle were
attributed to beasts having been shot with an elf-arrow. 'Elf-marked'
was used to describe birth defects. Not nice. The name itself comes
from the Old Eng. aelf, Icelandic alft, German alp, meaning nightmare.
So it was for a millennium or more.
Then, of course it all changes.
Along comes JRR Tolkien. Suddenly Elves are wonderful. Handsome, brave,
cultured, intelligent, civilised and unremittingly good. Everything, in
fact, that humans aspire to. To much so for some people. It's reported
that at a gathering of what became the Inklings, JRRK was describing a
new character and C.S. Lewis cried out "Oh God, no! Not another f*****g
elf!"
Who can put their hand on their heart (or wallet) and declare that
their conception of Elves has not been influenced by LotR? I'll bet
damn few. Now if, instead of 'House Elf' they had been called say,
'House Awks', (that spelling is deliberate) what would be the likely
response to their situation? "Serve the little buggers right." Again,
unconscious notions derived from LotR.
Without the documented background necessary to be able to view Elves
objectively, we are in danger of perpetuating preconceptions formed
elsewhere.
As an aside, I've noticed that some identify Dumbledore with Gandalf.
Another unwarranted assumption, with only superficial evidence to
support it - both male, white beard, good, wizard. Further parallels
can be constructed, but I suspect that this is because the constructee
*wants* it to be that way. Dangerous to do before the tale is ended.
You could end up feeling cheated, when you've cheated yourself. Me, I
fancy a Merlin figure, but what do I know.
Back to the Elves.
Where do they come from? Anyone seen or heard of an Elf child? No,
neither have I, though the Blacks seem to have had a succession of
genetically similar Elves. In PoA Ron says of Dobby, "..he's bound to
come from an old wizarding family. They'll be rich, too." *Old*
wizarding family? Are they an historical hold-over? How long do they
live for anyway? And rich - why is it necessary to be rich? Are they
bought? If so, where from? Maybe captured from the wild or bred on
farms; or are they made like the Golem of Prague? Certainly they
shouldn't be expensive to keep. If they are bought then you wouldn't
need to be rich to maintain one, so why a rich family? Could they be
indentured servants? And why should clothes set them free?
The three individual Elves encountered so far cannot be typical.
We make elves what they are says Dumbledore and what have we got?
Dobby - ex Malfoy household. Not exactly an environment of peace and
understanding, conducive to waking in the morning with a song on your
lips.
Keacher - ex Blacks. Same only more so.
Winky - ex Crouch. Call the Social Services, some-one.
By contrast, the Elves working at Hogwarts are happy, co-operative and
contented. They refuse Hermiones gifts of clothing as an insult, as if
it would be an affront to their dignity. They even stop cleaning
Gryffindor Tower as a reprisal. What is going on?
Elves have significant natural magical powers that militate against the
idea of coercion. Lucius Malfoy really did not fancy facing down a free
House Elf; but he knew it to be ineffectual when part of the family.
What constrains them? I'm willing to bet that there's a magical
contract in there somewhere, one that the Elves enter into voluntarily.
It's just their bad luck that some end up with a Black or a Malfoy.
We can dispute back and forth as long as we like - or at least until
the next book, or the one after when JKR will fill in the gaps for us.
Meantime, if you feel really strongly about forced Elvish labour, then
come December, picket the bloke in the red suit. Santas' Elves don't
get paid either.
Kneasy
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive