Do the Death Eaters know Snape is with the Order?

[jesmck]

No: HPFGUIDX 68388

--- In HPforGrownups at yahoogroups.com, "mkaliz" <kai_z at o...> wrote:
> --- In HPforGrownups at yahoogroups.com, "ffimiles" <ffionmiles at h...> 
> 
> > But what I've always wondered is, in GoF, when LV is musing about 
> > which death eaters are present, and which are not, he does say 
> > something about one having betrayed them, or at elast being
msising 
> > from their ranks for good, and that he will be found and dealth 
> > with.  I assume dhe meant Snape at this point, because Snape
wasn't 
> > present in the graveyard - and if he's now supposed to be an 
> > unsuspected member of the DE, then surely he ought to have turned
up 
> > at this point?
> 
> But we don't know for certain that Snape wasn't in the graveyard. He
> could well have been, with a couple flips of Dumbledore's time
turner.


jesmck writes:
Snape does have the dark mark and it did start to burn.  I thought LV
was referring to both him and Karakoff (sp? I'm at work and don't have
the book with me), because Karakoff spoke out against LV when he was
thought to be dead.  LV said two were missing.  I might be remembering
incorrectly, but I think LV named everyone that was present too,
didn't he?

Snape is giving the Order some types of reports in OotP, which I
assumed were from DEs, but it's never clear because we never see him
interact with them.  He didn't seem to be at the MoM, but they don't
name everyone there, so it is possible.  There's always that Snape is
a vampire theory that's floating around, maybe he's reporting for
them?