Number of Students at Hogwarts
Doriane
delwynmarch at yahoo.com
Thu Jul 10 09:56:07 UTC 2003
No: HPFGUIDX 69035
James" wrote:
> We din't know numbers for all the houses. Logically there would be
> more people in some houses than others, if the Sorting hat sorts for
> ability and not 'make it even'ness.
Especially according to the last Sorting Hat's song : Slytherin,
Ravenclaw and Gryffyndor are "choosy", but Hufflepuff takes all the
rest.
> I think we need to refer back to Harry again. We see the WW through
> him and so notice what he does. When he looks along the staff table
> he only 'sees' the people he knows,
I seem to remember that at least once or twice, we get a full account
of all the teachers at the staff table. And there are only those we
know. Which now that I think of it is weird, since it doesn't leave
any teacher for Muggles studies for example. I'd have to re-read
that, but still I'm pretty sure we are given a full description of
the whole table at least once or twice.
And then of course, maybe you have many loners like Trelawney, who
don't come and eat with the others...
> and this must be true with the students. The boys in his dormitory
> feature heavily, others barely mentioned.
Yes, but still ! At the beginning of the year, the door to his
dormitory always bear a sign saying "x year". And that dormitory is
described as containing only 5 beds. So if there were other boys in
Gryffyndor in Harry's year, how would they know who was supposed to
go in which dormitory ? The sign should have been more precise,
especially in 1st year : "1st years, L-Z", for example, or a list of
names. But it just said "1st years", and it contains only 5 beds, and
no other boys are ever mentioned in his year and House, so it's
pretty clear that there are only 5 boys in Gryffyndor in Harry's
year. And if that's any indication of the total number of students,
then there's no way there can be 1000 students in the school.
HOWEVER : the school can very much have been conceived with that
number (1000) in mind. We have to remember that Harry and Co were
born at the end of the 1st LV War. Which means that for years, most
wizard families didn't have many kids (the Weasleys being the
exception :-), because people tend to delay having kids while at war.
But once the war ended, there was most probably a baby boom. So,
between the Muggle-born children whose number never decreased since
their parents weren't concerned with the LV War, and the baby boom, I
guess the years after Harry might be much more crowded.
Del
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive