The Elf Problem
tigerpatronus
tigerpatronus at yahoo.com
Thu Jul 10 18:09:06 UTC 2003
No: HPFGUIDX 69124
--- In HPforGrownups at yahoogroups.com, B Arrowsmith
<arrowsmithbt at b...> wrote:
<SNIP> By contrast, the Elves working at Hogwarts are happy, co-
operative and
> contented. They refuse Hermiones gifts of clothing as an insult, as
if > it would be an affront to their dignity. They even stop cleaning
> Gryffindor Tower as a reprisal. What is going on?
>
> Elves have significant natural magical powers that militate against
the > idea of coercion. <SNIP> I'm willing to bet that there's a
magical > contract in there somewhere, one that the Elves enter into
voluntarily. > It's just their bad luck that some end up with a Black
or a Malfoy. <SNIP>
>
> Kneasy
Apologies to Kneasy for truncating your excellent, well-reasoned
argument.
Do you remember, lo so many years ago, in the Hitchhiker's series
somewhere (I think it was the *Restaurant at the End of the
Universe*) the sentient animal that was bred to want to be eaten? It
was rolled out on a cart amongst the diners, and the beast pointed
out it's own well-marbled flanks and luscious rump roast, etc., ready
for their dining pleasure. At the end of the scene, it was removed to
the kitchen, butchered, and consumed. The point was, of course, that
the beast was a sentient being, and both eating it and breeding it to
want to be eaten are monstrous. (Yes, I'm a vegetarian. Why do you
ask?)
The same with the house elves. Both enslaving them and maintaining
their slave-mindset are monstrous. I am uncomfortably reminded of the
pre-Civil War mentality that existed among those who were pro-slavery
in the US (and I deeply apologize to anyone who is black or of
African descent here for writing this foul stuff): the happy darky
toiling in the fields, singing N---o spirituals. (I don't know if
that word is okay, so I'll err on the side of caution.) The "good" or
pretty slaves were removed from the fields to work in the big house,
establishing a system of rewards for complicity and, most likely,
forestalling mass rebellion.
The popular misconception from those times was also that black folks
couldn't survive on their own without the Massah to take care of
them, provide them with (bad) food, clothes on their backs, etc.
Indeed, many slaveowners forced slaves to attend Christian church,
presumably saving their souls (imposing the dominant culture and
destroying their own.) But slavery was (I'm having problems thinking
of strong enough words here) a soulless, pitiless, evil, horrendous,
monstrous, detestable, illogical, indefensable system.
It seems as if many things said about the House Elves are reminiscent
of the ideas promulgated by the pro-slavery movement prior to the
Civil War. I find this disturbing.
The other rationale for House Elf Enslavement is that, like dogs,
they have been bred by us to be subservient and fawning, and now it
is our responsibility to care for them. (By artificial selection, we
turned wolves into chihuahuas. Someone's burning in Hell for that.)
The difference between the dog model and the African-American slave
model is sentience. Dogs, while smart and wonderful and cuddly and
useful, are not sentient in any way that we test sentience. Pre-Civil
War slaves were human (mai oui!) and sentient. House Elves are
sentient.
I hope, I deeply hope, that the House Elves are under some sort of a
congenital Imperius Curse, and while some HE's (like Dobby) are made
of sterner stuff and can at least partially fight the IC (as this is
possible, a la Harry, GoF), most cannot.
This is supported by the fact that House Elves generally belong
to "Old Wizarding families" (as referenced somewhere in this thread,
Cos). Old Wizarding families or at least a subset of them (like the
Malfoys and Blacks but not like the Weasleys, which correlates with
Elf ownership) identified with the blandishments of Salazar
Slytherin, who was racist about magical abilities and lineages within
the human race (Mudbloods vs. Purebloods). His ideas about House
Elves must have been similarly inhumane, divisive, and illogical.
The Imperious Curse hypothesis also explains DD's kind reaction to
the HE's. If you know someone has a heart attack, you don't admonish
them to get over it. If you know someone is paralyzed, you don't mock
them until they can walk. If someone is mentally ill, you don't
lambast them to get sane. You help them do as much as they can, as
much as they want to, and hope medicine finds a pill to help them.
I hope that Hermione, with appropriate library usage, at an important
fulcrum of the story, finds a way to break the Imperious Curse and
frees the House Elves.
Can you imagine Lucius Malfoy fleeing into the forest with a posse of
angry HE's after him? ("I'll clean *your* clock, Malfoy," Binky
squeaked.)
TK -- TigerPatronus
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive