[HPforGrownups] The eternal dance (was major theory)

[Shaun Hately]

No: HPFGUIDX 70496

On 15 Jul 2003 at 8:34, Dan Feeney wrote:

> Now, the world is becoming more litigious, or certain parts of it,  
> but Shaun and Darrin's unhealthy arguments against Snape, for 
> example, in the context of a book where a good portion of what goes 
> on would be construed as criminal in the RW, attempt I think to place 
> the ethical imperatives evident in the books into an artificially 
> bland, mainstream, institutionalized, television context. I mean, 
> kids running around with wands would be like RW kids taking guns and 
> knives to school, by order, if such a simplistic, "letter of the law" 
> approach were taken. To quote Snape, "I see no difference."

Unhealthy? Care to explain the use of that particular term? What is 
'unhealthy' about my arguments? Or perhaps it's not my arguments. 
Perhaps you think I'm ill.

I'd really like an explanation of that term.

Yours Without Wax, Dreadnought
Shaun Hately | www.alphalink.com.au/~drednort/thelab.html
(ISTJ)       | drednort at alphalink.com.au | ICQ: 6898200 
"You know the very powerful and the very stupid have one
thing in common. They don't alter their views to fit the 
facts. They alter the facts to fit the views. Which can be 
uncomfortable if you happen to be one of the facts that 
need altering." The Doctor - Doctor Who: The Face of Evil
Where am I: Frankston, Victoria, Australia