[HPforGrownups] Good Slytherin (Was: Re: Thestrals and Slytherins)
CareALotsClouds at aol.com
CareALotsClouds at aol.com
Thu Jul 17 20:03:28 UTC 2003
No: HPFGUIDX 71190
In a message dated 17/07/03 20:42:56 GMT Daylight Time,
rubeus_hagrid at wanadoo.es writes:
> And greatelderone answered:
> > That was a bad thing? I think you are forgetting that Slytherin had
> > plans to purge the school of non-purebloods with the Basilisk and
> > also that he was heavily responsible for all that crap about
> > purebloods being better than the rest
> >
>
> I (IZaskun) add my 2 knuts:
> I think bibphile is right. You must remember the line: "Keep your friends
> close, and your enemies even closer".
> It would be a very bad thing if Slytherin house were eliminated. And it
> wouldn't be fair, not all Slytherin are potential DEs.
> Cheers, IZaskun
Yes Slytherin done that, but that was because he left. If he had stayed that
wouldnt of happened. So the Slytherins would be in the same way. Better to
keep them in. Like Zaskun, I think it is unfair. Talk about prejudice.
However, in the books they are portrayed to be *all* evil. When good things
happen and there is a speech in the Great Hall none of the Slytherins ever
clap (i think that this reason is peer pressure for good slytherins) and when
Cedric Diggory died the Slytherins didnt raise their glasses.
Funny then that in the movies, all Slytherins clap except for Draco and co.
(CoS)
Slytherins become victimised as soon as they are sorted into Slytherin. It
might just be the house for them because they are ambitious, but all the other
houses judge that person as 'evil' just because they are in that house.
My thought
Nic x x
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive