[HPforGrownups] Re: WW law
Przemyslaw Plaskowicki
przepla at ipartner.com.pl
Thu Jul 17 21:09:06 UTC 2003
No: HPFGUIDX 71216
On 7/17/2003 10:47 PM, Mark D. wrote:
> The whole hearing left a bad taste in my mouth. Are you sating that
> in the UK the judge can change the time of a hearing w/o notifying
> the accused? The accused does not have the right to counsel and the
> judge could decide against him by merely calling him a liar?
Harry was notified -- an owl was sent but they left before it arrived.
That was just a 'creative' way of using legal procedures ;-)
And _technically_ it was a disciplinary hearing not a felony case.
I belive, that every law, even the one most fair, can be used to achieve
unfair results.
> Fudge's administration seems full of favoritism, descrimination, and
> outright bribery. Are there no checks and balences against a MoM from
> outright trading favors for gold? (See Lucius Malfoy)
Well, that fits the overall view of WW as a 19th century culture.
> I realize that according to the Potterverse we American are not
> considered smart enough to figure out what a Philosophers Stone is,
> but I feel our government makes a littlre more sense.
No offence, but I'll gladly dispel myth of US as a best democracy in the
world. (Of course on OT-Chatter list).
Regards,
Pshemekan
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive