Who Trusts Snape?! (OofP spoilers)
kiricat2001
Zarleycat at aol.com
Sat Jul 19 11:34:33 UTC 2003
No: HPFGUIDX 71593
--- In HPforGrownups at yahoogroups.com, "T.M. Sommers" <tms2 at m...>
wrote:
> kiricat2001 wrote:
> > --- In HPforGrownups at yahoogroups.com, "T.M. Sommers" <tms2 at m...>
> > wrote:
> >
> >>tigerpatronus wrote:
> >>
> >>>And DD hired Lockehart, that poseur.
> >>
> >>We are told that there were no other applicants for the job.
> >
> > Although we are also told that our guy Snape has regularly been
> > applying for the job...
>
> Which indicates that Dumbledore thinks that Snape would be worse
> than Lockhart.
>
> >>>And DD thought SB was indeed the mass murderer.
> >>
> >>So did everyone else. And as far as I know, Sirius never denied
> >>that he was the murderer (before his escape, that is); at least
> >>it's never mentioned that he did.
> >
> > Of course, if you're bunged up in Azkaban post-haste, who are you
> > going to tell? And, as far as we know, Dumbledore, who worked
with
> > Sirius in the first version of the Order, made no effort to try
to
> > get his side of the story, either.
>
> He had the opportunity when he was caught; instead he just
> laughed maniacally.
That is Fudge's story, not Sirius'. And we know how Fudge likes to
keep up appearances. Doesn't it make a better story to tell people
about how he was one of the first on the scene (which he does say) to
confront a howling, cackling, maniacal Death Eater? Certainly sounds
more impressive that saying, we found this distraught young man
clutching his wand and talking about how a rat killed the Potters. I
find it perfectly believable that Sirius did try to tell people his
side of the story. And I also find it believable, given the tenor of
the times, that no one in authority listened to him.
Marianne
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive