Flesh of the not-so-faithful servant

[evangelina839]

No: HPFGUIDX 72047

--- In HPforGrownups at yahoogroups.com, "acoteucla" <acoteucla at h...>
wrote:
> > "Flesh of the servant willingly given, blood of the enemy
forcibly 
> > taken."  I find it very interesting that the "faithful servant" 
> that 
> > donates the flesh owes a life-debt to the "enemy" that donates
the 
> > blood.  Perhaps this fact will prove central to how Voldemort is 
> > ultimately vanquished?  For instance, if Pettigrew shows loyalty
in 
> > some fashion to Harry over Voldemort, would this weaken Voldemort 
> in 
> > some way?
<snip>
> > It doesn't make for a exciting finale (no big duel or anything), 
> but 
> > I think that Harry is somehow going to destroy Voldemort with 
> love.  
> > Dumbledore repeatedly says that this is what Harry has in large 
> > abundance, but Voldemort does not have at all.  It prevents 
> Voldemort 
> > from possessing Harry.
<snip>

Aha! I think Matrix. How did Neo conquer Agent Smith in the first
Matrix movie? He 
possessed him. Voldemort can't possess Harry, but Harry can possess
Voldemort and 
thus destroy him! Ta-da. Unless you have a problem with copycats of
course. 
(Although technically, if that *was* JKR's plan all along, she would
have been first.)
Anyway... I think you're perfectly right with Voldemort's flawed
revival, acoteucla. 
Pettigrew's part is not over yet, I'm sure of it.
evangelina