Snape as new DADA teacher (was "New Dark Arts Teacher")
acoteucla
acoteucla at hotmail.com
Tue Jul 22 03:03:30 UTC 2003
No: HPFGUIDX 72206
--- In HPforGrownups at yahoogroups.com, "T.M. Sommers" <tms2 at m...>
wrote:
> I agree entirely about Harry's unsuitability to be an auror,
> especially his lack of paranoia.
And I'm going to have to entirely disagree. Harry suitable to be an
auror? It's a no-brainer! He thinks well in do-or-die situations,
is very talented, and is fairly intelligent. He has proven himself
at a very young age by surviving challenges that would have destroyed
many full-trained aurors. Admittedly there was a lot of luck
involved, but his luck would have availed him nothing without talent
and clear-headedness. He thinks like an auror according to the fake
Moody, and I have no reason not to believe him.
In response to your comment that he "lacks paranoia", first of all,
paranoia is *usually* a learned trait. Just because he isn't
paranoid now doesn't mean he won't be later. Second, paranoia would
only lend itself to a few aspects of dark-wizard hunting. Tonks and
Shacklebolt show very little signs of paranoia, so there is no reason
to assume that an auror must be paranoid. Cautious, yes.
Admittedly, Harry is not cautious. He is ruled by his heart more
often than his head. But again, this is something that can be
learned. Aurors require more schooling after their initial
education, and I assume that lessons in caution are included. There
are some things that can't be learned: talent, intelligence, and
keeping your cool in tight situations. Harry has these. He can
learn the rest.
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive