Wands for Animagi
kellymcj2000
kelly at protocallonline.com
Fri Jul 25 21:34:54 UTC 2003
No: HPFGUIDX 73149
--- In HPforGrownups at yahoogroups.com, "michaelkgidlow"
<Veritas771 at h...> wrote:
> Does a wizard need a wand to transform into his animal self? I
always
> assumed that he didn't, but when I was reading the part in PoA when
> Trelawny makes her prediction, she says that the servant has
> been "chained" for twelve years. Does that mean that he couldn't
> transform for those twelve years? But when he transforms after
Lupin
> becomes a werewolve, he doesn't have wand because Harry has just
> expelled it from his hand. But when we see him in the other books,
it
> is not in his animal-form. I'm confused. Any insight would be
> appreciated.
>
> Michael Gidlow
KelMc
I say no, they do not need a wand. I think Pettigrew chooses to
remain in animal form for those 12 years. He is 'chained' because if
he does transform he'll be killed or imprisoned by death eaters or
the ministry. The only way he wouldn't be is if he lived outside the
wizarding world, and he doesn't want to do that in case moldy Voldy
does come back. Also, when Sirius transforms in Azkaban he doesn't
have a wand. In fact, when he transforms back to human in the
shreiking shack he doesn't have one and has to use Ron's and Snape's
wands.
KelMc
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive