Portkeys Explained
Alon van Dam
alanphoenix1 at hotmail.com
Mon Jun 2 10:28:44 UTC 2003
No: HPFGUIDX 59148
Dear all,
Since this is the first message I'm writing in this group (yay!), I
don't know if what I'm writing has been written before. however, it
seems to me that a lot of discussion is going on about portkeys.
Apparently, the difference between the shoe-portkey of the QWC and
the cup of the TWC annoys people.
Now, I will admit to have a (one) problem with the portkeys as well,
but I'll mention that at the end of this message. First, I'd like to
go into a short explanation of why I think these different kinds of
portkeys were employed:
I've seen mention of different types of portkeys, time-activated and
touch-activated. I'll keep the distinction here. I have never had
problems with these different portkeys, since it makes sense to me:
1) The Portkey to go to the QWC needed to be in a public place, for
people living at different places to congregate there, and it would
be quite heinous if some random muggle pilfered the trash and came
across the shoe (however unlikely) and would be teleported to the
QWC, also taking away the transportation option for the WW's: Minor
crisis. Therefore, a time-option would have been ADDED to the normal
portkey (which would be touch-activated) to make it so that only
people touching the object at a certain time would be teleported.
Since the WW's know the time, it minimizes chances of anything going
wrong a thousandfold.
2) The one at the TWC couldn't have ben Time-related. It was hard
enough for Crouch/Moody to make sure that Harry would be the first
one to touch the Cup (and almost fizzles in that as well): There was
no way he could possibly have correctly guesstimated the time on the
dot. Therefore, he needed to make sure that Harry was just the first
one touching the object, which is what he did.
As you see, both kinds of portkeys have their advantages and
disadvantages. I believe, however, that the correct one was used for
every occasion. How hard is it to believe that Wizards who can create
a portkey can also add a time-function to it: Cause that's what the
time-portkey is, nothing more.
The problem I have with the portkey is that it would seem stupid to
make the TWC-Portkey a two-way object. If I'd been Harry or Cedric, I
would take the TWC along with me while exploring (maybe just too much
roleplaying on my behalf). A possibility I considered is that all
portkeys are two-way. However, I seem to remember that at the QWC all
the used portkeys were just dumped into a large pile, so I don;'t
know... Maybe time-activated portkeys also have a timed return-time,
whereas touch-activated also have touch-returns... That, or
the 'added waypoint'-theorem, or the idea of a safe-catch... Either
way, it was quite foolish of Crouch/Moody, Peter, and Voldemort ;)
Hope this helps the discussion in some way,
Alon
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive