Much Ado About Money
taylorlynzie
leperockon at aol.com
Thu Jun 5 04:29:20 UTC 2003
No: HPFGUIDX 59358
Lately the main topic of interest on these boards has been about the
Weasley's and their "money situation" and I decided to jump on the
bandwagon. Most people are leaning in one of two extremes:
[1]-- That the Weasley's are wrong for spending money on a trip to
Egypt, ect ect.
or
[2]-- The Weasley's were correct in spending money on a trip to
Egypt, ect ect.
In my opinion I honestly do not think that this trip to Egypt was
bad, in fact I think it was something good. Sure the Weasley's are
tight on money-- even poor but they are in no way in desperate
poverty, either. There is always food on their plates and clothes on
their backs. Seeing as there was money for these nessessities- though
not always in the most abundant supply- a nice Holiday to Egypt seems
in tow. We also do not know all the details of the trip. Considering
that Bill works there they were probably able to get room and board
for free, or considerably cheaper then if they had gone there with no
connections. This trip was probably a great moral booster, and a
chance for the family to get together and spend some good quality
time together, outside of the home. Arthur and Weasley don't see
their children for 10 monthes of the year, 9 1/2 if they come home
for Christmas and we all know how much that happens.
The Weasley's are without a doubt in a bit of a tight spot as far as
money is concerned but that does not mean that they aren't entitled
to a family holiday if the oppurtunity is available. Also just
because it says that the Weasley's are poor doesn't mean that they
aren't able to pay for everything. Lots of people buy things second
hand in order to save money, and having 7 kids would defintly qualify
you for saving money.
The incident in GoF that everyone discusses is Ron and Mrs Weasleys
little incident about the maroon dress robes. To be honest, to me it
sounds a bit like typical Ron. He has always been a bit of the pouter
type, this is all with fairly good reason considering that he is the
second youngest out of 7 and is probably quite accustomed to pouting
in order to get something that he wants, this also explains his quick
temper and extreme sense of loyalty. Of course he wouldn't like the
robes, they were maroon, they had ruffles, and lastly and prehaps
most importantly they were bought second-hand. I think that the
reason why Ron is so touchy about this subject is most likely the
fact that his best friend is Harry Potter and his best friend has
quite a bit of money to spend as he wishes, he doesn't want Harry to
hear they his mum had to buy his robes at a second hand shop. They
could be almost exactly like Harrys except perhaps maroon and bought
in a second hand shop and he would've made a big deal because they
were maroon but it was really because of the second hand quality.
Also people say that Mrs Weasley was at fault because she could've
severed off the lace or she could've magically made them "better" or
knitted Ron robes specially for him. She wouldn't have time! Think
about this people, she has 7 children a husband, and two other people
in her house (Harry and Hermione) to worry about, she is extremely
busy. I can't really see her having time to just sit down and knit a
dress robe for Ron, which of course he would have to have one knitted
for Fred and George as well because she can't do it for just one.
True she knits everyone sweaters and socks for Christmas but thi sis
when everyone is off at school and she is not as busy as she would
be. As for the severing charm she probably wasn't thinking about it.
I don't think it was an attempt to punish Ron for anything. Buying
these second hand isn't a crime and Ron is merely being the immature
15 year-old boy that he is. Of course he isn't going to get it, all
of the books have showed that Ron's canon character is a bit on the
immature side, personally I don't see how this surprised some people.
I am not saying that the other people are wrong, perhaps the
Weasley's have been careless in their spendings. We won't really know
until if/when JKR tells us what exactly is the finanical situation
for the Weasleys. It could be that they are so povered that they
shouldn't be spending money on lavish trips, or it could also be that
they can get by okay on going a bit sparingly on things and still
able to take trips. Only time will tell, but personally I believe
that the Weasleys are not as desperate as many people think, they are
merely a bit stretched for money oweing to the fact of having so many
children.
Tay :D
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive