[HPforGrownups] Re: Pullman is Lockhart was Re: The Hidden Key to Harry Pott
Kia
kiatrier at yahoo.com
Sat Jun 14 20:15:43 UTC 2003
No: HPFGUIDX 60432
Penny wrote:
>I do think though that the question of whether her novels are
>Christian allegory or intended to be infused with Christian
>symbolism is a matter of interpretation.
>I do wonder too about the opposite trend ....... it seems quite a
>few people have their own agenda to disprove that HP couldn't
>possibly be Christian.
But there is a difference between pointing out that Rowling's
work right now is not outright Christian and cannot be compared
with Lewis and Tolkien and starting to speculate heavily on her
attending the Church of Scottland and on symbolism which
might have mundane explanation. One is a fact and the other is
an assumption and speculation on future plot developements.
Harry surviving the Voldemort attack, is not the same as Aslan
coming back to life in The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe.
It's not so cut and dried in Rowling's work, that you can
immediately identify her as Christian author.
Penny wrote:
>He identifies the same Christian symbolism in the griffin,
>unicorn, phoenix, red lion, hippogriff and centaurs.
...
> Killinger argues that the world of magic and miracles is
>part of the Judeo-Christian heritage. He also points out that the
>notion that the dead can assist the living, which is ever-present
>in the Potterverse, is also a concept familiar to many
>Christians.
And this is where there is a logical fallacy is involved -
something turns up in Christian mythology therefore it must be
Christian. Red lions, phoenix, ressurections, centaurs, the dead
aiding the living are not Christian inventions. Christianity didn't
invent them.
To claim magical creatures and magical plot devices as
Christian especially when they are not even a blip on the radar
of "mainstream Christianity" is ignoring the fact that if you want
to write about magical creatures your choices are limited to
dragons, unicorn, centaurs, mermaids and phoenixes.
And there is a certain selection taking place, isn't it? So what
about mermaids, trolls and goblins? What's the Christian
symbolism in house-elves? If the Gryffindor lion is a Christian
symbol, what about the Hufflepuff badger?
I have issues with the way these authors claim everything
claimable as Christian.
Like:
>He believes that indomitable hope is perhaps the strongest
>message of the Harry Potter novels
Hope is older than Christianity and I suspect it's even older
than religion itself. Claiming it as exclusively Christian theme
has me in a disagreeable mood.
My problem is not that Rowling is not writing Christian themed
books, because I think she does (Even if it is a no-show right
now.), but Granger and company claiming it from everything
they can, especially fairly innocous details.
Granger is going a step to far when he states to have "a hidden
key" to the books. He is expecting too much of the books - not
only is Rowling supposed to write a gripping story, excellent
characterization, a mystery plot, a battle between good and evil
(not a Christian invention either), a coming-of-age story, a
moral message, an invented fantasy world, but also works
heavily on inserting Christian symbolism into the plot in order to
hint off to future plot developements.
Maybe she does work on that, but I doubt that it is as heavily as
Granger and Co. want her to.
Kia
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive