OoP thoughts and re: house-elves
arrowsmithbt
arrowsmithbt at btconnect.com
Sun Jun 22 20:25:57 UTC 2003
No: HPFGUIDX 61412
--- In HPforGrownups at yahoogroups.com, "Kia" <kiatrier at y...> wrote:
> Thoughts, opinions, sunk theories? Anyone?
>
> Am I the only one who got the distinctive impression that OotP is
> the most political of the books so far?
>
> The fountain and the lie it told. The never-mentioned-before fact
> that the goblins do not have full rights in the Wizarding World, the
> ignorant, bureaucratic and therefore consequently evil
> government, the bought media... at least some of these things
> have contemporary relevance.
>
> Jenny wrote:
>
> >>>1. What do you all think of House Elves now, especially with
> the awful Kreacher being introduced? Do they really choose their
> lot or are they completely "trained" by their owners (as
> Dumbledore implied)?<<<<<
>
>
> I believe more than ever, especially with the house-elves treated
> exactly as centaurs and goblins (who are fighting for more rights
> for centuries), that house-elf enslavement is wrong. Kreacher
> works as pro-argument because his "conditioning" is what turns
> him evil. (Hermione is right, the elves are brainwashed.) The
> problem is that they *cannot* choose their fate even if they
> wanted to. They have no choice, because they have no rights and
> are enslaved. And as long as they don't have a choice, no on can
> argue that they *choose* to be enslaved.
>
> Me:
The Gryffindor house elves chose not to accept Hermiones' clothing offer - even felt
insulted by it
Kneasy
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive