OOP-thoughts/questions esp. Prophecy
chappysmom
DBoyken at aol.com
Sun Jun 22 22:15:54 UTC 2003
No: HPFGUIDX 61539
--- In HPforGrownups at yahoogroups.com, "dally1025" <dally_1025 at h...>
wrote:
> S
> P
> O
> I
> L
> E
> R
>
> S
> P
> A
> C
> E
>
> B
> E
> W
> A
> R
> E
> !
> Anyway, the phrase "neither can live while the other survives,"
> really got me confused. Does it mean that Voldy can't come back
full > force unless he kills Harry? Does it mean that Harry won't
ever be > able to enjoy life (it appears to be getting worse and
worse every > year for poor Harry) fully until he kills Voldy???
------I think yes, definitely, Voldemort can't have his "life" unless
Harry dies, and He has to die for Harry to have a real life--only V
doesn't know that because he doesn't know that part of the prophecy.
He know's Harry's a threat--just not how much. The first half of that
sentence: "Either must die at the hand of the other". To me that
means that (1) Harry's got to kill Voldemort because nobody else is
going to be able to (climax of book 7?), but also that (2) Nobody
else is going to be able to kill Harry EXCEPT Voldemort. The death-
eaters weren't going to be able to actually kill him if they'd hit
him with any of those avada kedavras.
The thing that worries me is the word "either"--how is she using it?
Does that mean "one" must die at the hand of the other and then the
survivor will be free from this mystical connection? Or does it mean
that "each" must die at the hand of the other, in which case Harry is
doomed at the end of book 7 because they'll kill each other at the
grand finale? The word "either" has been worrying me all night.
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive