OOP: prophecy loophole?
doseylel
doseylel at aol.com
Tue Jun 24 14:44:37 UTC 2003
No: HPFGUIDX 62897
--- In HPforGrownups at yahoogroups.com, "Grey Wolf" <greywolf1 at j...>
wrote:
> --- In HPforGrownups at yahoogroups.com, "doseylel" <doseylel at a...>
wrote:
> > The only way I see JKR having LV kill Harry is if the one who
> > survives is stripped of all magic powers, becoming a muggle.
That
> > way, Harry has still saved the WW, without becoming a murderer.
> >
> > Doseylel (who is still trying to get rid of a throbbing headache,
> > from too much reading and not enough sleep)
>
> Unfortunately, the prophecy speaks of "die at the hand of the
other".
> While a loophole might exist surrounding the meaning of "at" in
that
> phrase, or at some other point, "die" is clear enough - someone's
life
> has to cease completely (i.e. must not survive) for the prophecy to
be
> fullfilled. Die does not allow in any way I can think off to simply
> loose magical powers. Indeed, Voldemort would *want* to die if that
> happened to him, and Harry would regret such thing but wouldn't
> consider it dying either.
>
> Hope that helps,
>
> Grey Wolf, who is also trying to find loopholes in the prophecy
Now me:
I'm sorry I didn't make myself very clear. I meant that LV DOES kill
Harry, but at that point he also loses his powers, and is therefore
no longer a threat to the Wizarding world. That would be a fate
worse than death for him.
Doseylel
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive