OOP: Grades of Recycling - was - Re: Two-way Mirror

[pickle_jimmy]

No: HPFGUIDX 64759

--- In HPforGrownups at yahoogroups.com, "medeacallous" 
<medeacallous at y...> wrote:
> 
>  
>   
> 
> --- In HPforGrownups at yahoogroups.com, "Grey Wolf" <greywolf1 at j...> 
> wrote:
> 
> <snip>
> > 
> > My edition (British) is made with recycled paper, so no trees 
> lost. I 
> > understand that the Canadian is recycled too. 
> <snip>
> > 
> > Hope that helps,
> > 
> > Grey Wolf
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Um, Grey Wolf...
> 
> Could you clarify the info about OotP British edition being printed 
> on recycled paper? As far as I know, and according to several web 
> sources (links below), the Canadian edition is the only one printed 
> on entirely post-consumer paper, which means it's the only one 
which 
> used zero trees. It may be that the British edition contains 
> recycled fibres, or is all recycled but not all post-consumer, but 
> that would mean that it is not a 'zero trees' print run. May I ask 
> the source of your information that the UK edition is 'tree free'? 
> What exactly does this source say?
> 
> BTW, here's the information about the Canadian edition:
> 
> http://www.oldgrowthfree.com/potter.html 
> *scroll down to the 'Ancient Forest Friendly Potter Facts' title
> 
> http://www.calendarlive.com/books/cl-fi-
> potter19jun19,0,2173988.story?coll=cl-books-features 
> *scroll down to the third-to-last paragraph
> 
> 

Where do we stand on pirate electronic copies downloaded from the 
internet? No trees there! (Are we more concerned about trees or 
piracy? no answer needed)
I would have thought as long as the book was printed on a renewable 
paper source that should satisfy everyone. 
If the paper I recycled to print HP came originally from old growth 
forest is that OK? I'm reusing something I shouldn't have used in the 
first place.

Pickle Jimmy (who bought his copy in Australia, and doesn't know if 
he killed a tree or not :-(