OOP: Something that disturbed me
jenny_ravenclaw
meboriqua at aol.com
Fri Jun 27 13:21:22 UTC 2003
No: HPFGUIDX 64887
--- In HPforGrownups at yahoogroups.com, "marinafrants" <rusalka at i...>
> wrote:
> Okay, here's something I haven't seen brought up yet: am I the only
one who was disturbed by the way Kingsley just blithely rewrote
Marietta's memory in "The Centaur and the Sneak" chapter?>
No, you're not the only one. I was actually hoping something was
wrong with Marietta herself in that scene and that's why she said
nothing. I didn't have any problem with Hermione's spell, though.
Hermy's quill responded:
>In GOF, We had seen wizards casting memory charm again and again on a
muggle camp manager during Quidditch World Cup and the charm made him
forgetting things, going out of context for a while and wizards said
those effects were just temporary. You must have noticed that Barty
Crouch cast strong memory charm on Bertha and Lockhart always used
very strong memory charm on his knowledge resources so it seems that
casting a charm is related to intentions and intensity and Kingsley
just put mild charm on Marietta.>
So it would only have been bad if the charm wasn't mild, but strong?
I can't buy that. I noticed that in OoP, people in the Order and on
the side of Good in general do things that are sneaky, unfair, or just
plain mean. Harry's use of the Cruciatus Curse still bothers me, as
does Sirius's recklessness and encouragement of Harry to break rules
at school. All I can say to justify these things is that in times of
war, people do what they have to do to survive. Had Marietta told the
MoM people what she and her peers had been doing all year, the
consequences would have been very bad.
I think we'll be seeing more sketchy behavior in books 6 & 7, and I'm
willing to bet Harry will be a part of that.
--jenny from ravenclaw ************************
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive