OOP: Harry and violence (spoilers)

[scaryfairymary]

No: HPFGUIDX 65847

s
p
o
i
l
e
r

s
p
a
c
e
.
.
.  

   I have noticed while reading through some posts (although 
glancing might be a better description) that any time the issue of 
Harry's cruciatus curse on Bellatrix arises there seems to be a 
generally accepted opinion that what he did was wrong.  Now dont get 
me wrong, violence is unacceptable, but think of the circumstances.  
She had just killed the person closest to Harry's heart, she 
tortured Neville's parents to the point that they are now worse than 
dead and whats more she *laughs* about it, taunting Harry and 
deliberately trying to get a reaction.  I was seething (also finding 
it hard to read as I tried desperately to blink the tears back so I 
could continue reading).  I for one was *cheering* for Harry, and 
when Bellatrix told him he had to *mean* the curse I was praying 
he'd try again.
   I'm not entirely sure why it came as a shock to people either.  
If I remember correctly, Harry had once said that Sirius desrved the 
dementors' kiss before he was aware of his innocence.  IMO, the kiss 
from a dementor is a far bigger punishment than a cruciatus curse.  
There was also a moment in the shrieking shack with Sirius, when 
Harry mentioned that for the first time in his life he wanted his 
wand to harm someone as opposed to merely protect himself.  This 
happened when Harry was 13, he is now 15, older, bolder and also 
going through a stage in his life that means his emotions 
(particularly anger) are closer to the surface than ever.  
  It is therefore my opinion that it is not altogether surprising or 
indeed condemnable, that Harry performed (albeit badly) the 
cruciatus curse.

I'd just like to see if there is anyone else who agrees with my 
position on this.

Mary (who apologises for the lack of coherence in her argument but 
is putting it down to lack of sleep due to Harry Potter overdose!!!)