Weasley deaths

[brinforest]

No: HPFGUIDX 53273

--- In HPforGrownups at yahoogroups.com, "psychodudeneo" 
<psychomaverick at h...> wrote:

> I think the unlikelyhood lies in the number of Weasleys more than 
> anything.  I could see two to three getting the axe, but killing 
> every single one of them - including the ones that are scattered 
> (like Bill, Charlie, and possibly the Twins at this point too) 
seems 
> like a lot of trouble for Voldy or his cronies to go through for 
> Potter's SIDEKICK.  (snip)> 
 Hunting down a small 
> army of a family seems a tad unlikely and complicated.  Yeah yeah, 
> Voldy did it before with the Potters.  But to suggest that Ron's 
> lineage has the same importance/uniqueness or quality would 
diminish 
> Harry's (not that Harry's special origins and talents couldn't use 
> being took down a peg).
> 

Me:

Remember that Voldemort is not the absolutely only one who could 
bring about the death of the Weasleys. We know of someone who has a 
major hatred problem towards them, an undoubtably evil and 
deceiptful personality, a sharply contradicting attitude towards 
muggles, and a DE background to boost. 

Even though Voldemort and gang want very much to kill Harry, I don't 
think there's any way the racism theme would be altogether 
forgotten, it's way too important. I strongly believe the DEs are 
going to kill muggles, muggle-born witches and wizards *and* pure-
blooded witches and wizards who sympathise with muggles. 

Finally, the fact that the Weasleys are scattered *now* does not 
mean they will stay that way until the end of book 7, does it? There 
is still a lot to happen. Like people have been saying, there could 
easily be a time when the family are all together. And not every 
single one of them have to die, I personally believe in a theory 
that leaves Ron, Ginny and possibly the parents or one of them alive.


Brin