[HPforGrownups] Re: Weasley deaths
Janet Anderson
dorigen at hotmail.com
Thu Mar 6 16:45:52 UTC 2003
No: HPFGUIDX 53294
>Taking a slightly different perspective, in order for Ron to be an
>heir, he must be the eldest of his siblings. Instead of killing them
>all, could the same effect be achieved by not making them siblings?
>Suppose Mrs. Weasley had had an affair, and it was the father's
>bloodline that carried the heir of Hufflepuff? Which brings up
>another question - who? Theoretically it could be anyone who isn't
>important at all, but interesting that Dumbledore had red hair.
Okay, I was reading along, nodding at the logic of this theory (I don't
believe it at all, but it is entertaining), until I came to this. I do not
think Dumbledore could be the heir of Hufflepuff; to my mind, he's
Gryffindor through and through. Besides, he's got not only the Sorting Hat
(which could be because he's headmaster), but the Gryffindor sword.
(Question: are there artifacts for the other three houses?) Also, if
Dumbledore *were* the heir, his fathering a child wouldn't make the child
the heir until Dumbledore died.
Janet Anderson
* * * * * * * * * * * * *
An ordinary person says, "You have a face that would stop a clock." A
diplomat says, "When I look at you, time stands still."
_________________________________________________________________
The new MSN 8: smart spam protection and 2 months FREE*
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive