Rowling and Philosophy

Steve bboy_mn at yahoo.com
Wed Mar 12 20:18:26 UTC 2003


No: HPFGUIDX 53652

--- In HPforGrownups at yahoogroups.com, Sherri <bloodroses_thorn at y...>
wrote:
> ...edited...
> He's (Harry's) human.  He has human faults.  Which is
> why I have wondered many times why she ... make(s) 
> Voldemort so painfully inhuman.  It has always struck me 
> that Harry is allowed to play 'knight' ... yet Voldemort 
> isn't allowed to keep ... his humanity.  It is easier to hate
> a villain if said villain isn't human, but it isn't
> easily believable.  
> 
> ...edited...
> 
> -Sherri-neko =^.^=


bboy_mn:
In the world of JKR, things are not aways what they seem. Perhaps we
are being shown Voldemort as painfully inhuman as a setup for a time
when Voldemort is defeated by a sudden unforseen pang of humanity;
sort of, it's always darkest, just before the dawn.

We must remember 'the gleam'; we must remember the blood. In Voldemort
cruel inhuman reptilian blood now flows the blood of our noble knight.
Perhaps Voldemort's inhumanity has been corrupted or contaminated by
some small essence good, and that good will cause him to falter, to
hesitate at a crital moment, and that will lead to his downfall.

Just a thought.

bboy_mn





More information about the HPforGrownups archive