Fawkes' Age, "Wormtail" vs. Pettigrew, and Dumbledore as an Animagus
erisedstraeh2002
erisedstraeh2002 at yahoo.com
Tue Mar 25 17:09:07 UTC 2003
No: HPFGUIDX 54303
Martin wrote:
> From the interview it seems JKR named him Fawkes as a link to Guy
> Fawkes. Guy Fawkes died in 1606 inferring that Fawkes the phoenix
> can be no older than about 387 years (if CoS is set around 1993).
Now me:
Just because JKR has implied that she named Fawkes the phoenix after
Guy Fawkes doesn't mean that Fawkes the phoenix has to have been born
(for the first time) after the death of the real Guy Fawkes. I still
maintain that we have no idea how old Fawkes is, and since phoenixes
can live to an "immense" age in JKR's canon, Fawkes could be old
enough to have once been Godric Gryffindor's phoenix (or animagus,
depending on what you'd like to believe).
I originally wrote:
> So Voldemort may be afraid that the DEs will turn on Pettigrew if
> they knew it was Pettigrew, so he's decided to call
> Pettigrew "Wormtail" and let the DEs believe that Pettigrew is
> still dead.
and Becky responded:
> The DE's will abide by whatever Voldemort decides concerning the
> fate of this follower. And he is also in a position to
> simply tell them know Peter did NOT betray him. So protecting
> Pettigrew from Voldemort's followers has now become a moot point
> really.
Now me:
Now that Voldemort has regained his body, yes, I agree that
protecting Pettigrew from the other DEs has become a moot point.
However, since Pettigrew was a crucial part of Voldemort's plan to
regain his body and to regenerate using Harry's blood, I believe it
was important to Voldemort to keep his identity hidden, especially
from Barty Crouch Jr., who, in his own words, has stated: "if there's
one thing I hate more than any other, it's a Death Eater who walked
free." Pettigrew walked free, so in order for Pettigrew and Crouch
Jr. to work together to implement Voldemort's regeneration plan, it
is quite possible that Voldemort needed to hide Pettigrew's identity
from Crouch Jr. in order to keep Crouch Jr. from killing Pettigrew.
Now that Voldemort has been returned to his body, however, he has
less of a need to keep Pettigrew's identity hidden. Which leads me
to speculate on what might happen when (and if) Voldemort "breaks
open" Azkaban and sets the DEs free Voldemort might just feed
Pettigrew to his enemies.
Leigh wrote:
> We all seem to think that Dumbledore is an animagus <snip>
Now me:
Not all of us do! I don't! I think Dumbledore has powers that we
have yet to find out about (such as how he can make himself invisible
without an invisibility cloak), but I don't believe he's an animagus.
~Phyllis
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive