Graveyard scene
finwitch
finwitch at yahoo.com
Fri Mar 28 10:38:08 UTC 2003
No: HPFGUIDX 54487
--- In HPforGrownups at yahoogroups.com, "annemehr" <annemehr at y...>
wrote:
> Annemehr:
>
> Still, none of this negates my point that it is not likely Peter
would
> have abandoned his wand at the scene if he could have kept it.
>
> Annemehr
> resolving to be more careful in future and not rely on remembered
> quotes such as "...the biggest bit they found of [Pettigrew] was
his
> finger" and assume that that was *all* they found...
Wizards *would* think he'd not abandon his wand, Pettigrew knows
this. It's not the *finger* showing he's dead, it's his *wand*.
Wizard authorities believed Pettigrew dead *because* 'no wizard would
ever leave his wand behind' - which is why he did it. Two things
would prove wizard dead to a wizard: dead body or a wand left behind.
A lost finger simply isn't enough to prove that someone's dead. As to
how he lost it - he has cut his *hand* off! Finger is small thing
compared to that. Perhaps, on the day he decided to betray his
friends, he cut that finger off (possibly planted it back by magic,
but so he could leave it behind at will) - as one part of him that
was loyal?
Bloody clothes: A fake. He did leave something that looked like blood
to pretend he had been eaten by Crookshanks... where did he get that
in short notice? Same place he got the blood on the clothes he left
behind, I presume...
What ever else, Pettigrew is a master in pretending death in order to
survive. If he ever decides to leave Voldemort, he'd have to cut off
the hand Voldemort created...
-- Finwitch
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive