[HPforGrownups] So long as we're talking about time travel...
GulPlum
hp at plum.cream.org
Tue May 13 08:46:59 UTC 2003
No: HPFGUIDX 57738
Darrin:
<snip, perhaps oversnip (as long as it's not a parsnip)>
>Now, JKR can create whatever rules she wants for her world, so long
>as she's consistent within that world. She doesn't have to follow any
>other established time travel fiction rules.
>
>BUT... many of the classic Time Travel stories, such as the Time
>Machine and Back to the Future, use the "change time, not place"
>theory.
As Hermione's little jaunts throughout the year indicated, the Time-Turner
puts the subject close to wherever they were at the time of arrival. Close
enough to be able to dissemble, not so close as to bump into their earlier
self, and not so far away that should they be seen by someone, they
wouldn't ask "how the hell did you get here?" (which, even so, was asked of
Hermione on one occasion).
Like *so* many things in the Potterverse, you land up in *just* the right
spot. :-)
(incidentally, Monita should bear this in mind with regard to her little
"Hagrid Time-Turned to Godric's Hollow" theory she posited yesterday - if
he'd used a Time Turner, it would have deposited him wherever he had been
at the time of the attack! Or is Monita saying that Hagrid was the Fifth
Man?) :-)
I'm not an astrophysicist, but as it happens, considering the earth is
rotating around itself and the sun, and the solar system around itself
(etc, etc), in terms of absolute position, I expect you're quite a distance
away from where you were a few moments ago. So "Same place" in all of those
classic Time Travel stories is nothing of the sort.
--
GulPlum AKA Richard, who recently got up after less than 3 hours' sleep and
feels like it - Time Turner would be handy!
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive