Clue for the "ancient protection?"
Maria
queen_amidalachic at yahoo.com
Tue May 13 09:55:41 UTC 2003
No: HPFGUIDX 57745
> Kelly:
>
> Good point, and this could be another factor in their decision.
But I still
> think Petunia's word choice should not be ignored. She specifically
mentions
> coming back and finding the house in ruins. She does not say, "And
come
> back and find out you've blown up the house?" The first statement
just
> gives a potential state for the house, but does not say that Harry
will be
> the one to destroy the house. If she had said the latter, then it
would
> have shown she was afraid Harry's powers might escape him and he
might blow
> up the house for some reason. I think her word choice in that
section was
> key.
Maria:
Hmmm, first post! I feel a little intimidated coming here, because
you're all so brilliant... I feel very stupid, lol.
Ok... *takes a deep breath... don't kill me!
I'm reading the English edition of PS right now and I agree with
Kelly. It seems very sus that Petunia choose those words, then to
point the finger at Harry and say that 'he' would destroy the house.
So she might've known something about the protection or the danger
Harry was in, that maybe she kept from Vernon.
It's interesting to note that Harry had never heard about the letter
which Dumbledore had placed by his side when they laid him down on
the steps that nighthe first appeared at Privet drive. The letter
might have had something stating about the Protection... telling the
Dursleys to keep Harry safe from harm or even something else. But
Vernon might never have been told about the letter. Afterall the
first person to see Harry was Petunia.
This ancient Protection, is something we've been discussing on
another forum.
This magic would be simple... For example Harry's mother did not use
any wand magic, but sacraficed herself, giving her son ancient- yet
powerful protection from Voldemort.
So what if the act of being near a family or one person with non
dangerous intentions for that matter encircles Harry with protection?
Sure the Dursleys provide Protection, for Harry and the Weasleys
also... but Mrs. Figg could play a role in providing Ancient Magic
within the whole street in general, so Dark Magic cannot penetrate
the bounderies of the street.
However I think there is a couple of key points in GOF:
Dragons also Have ancient Magic surrounding them and yet this Ancient
Magic can be penetrated by 6-7 wizards.
Harry's ancient protection that was given from his mother was taken
away from him and now Voldemort can touch him.
So if these protections can be destroyed... then wouldn't Voldemort
eventually be able to break the rotection in Privet drive? If 6-7
wizards can bring down a fully protected Dragon who had been
protected by ancient protection, think of what voldemort could do.
Hope I didn't bore you.
Tata.
Maria
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive