The sorting of Dean Thomas
jennivirides
jennivirides at yahoo.co.uk
Sun May 18 11:02:37 UTC 2003
No: HPFGUIDX 58114
Annemehr wrote:
<< No creativity neccessary. Dean Thomas was inserted in the
Scholastic version; he his completely absent from the sorting
account
in the UK editions. So it was a Scholastic editor who couldn't count
in this case! >>
Catlady replied:
<So the Bloomsbury editor made a DIFFERENT mistake: Dean Thomas is
one
of Harry's roommates in the UK edition, so he SHOULD have been
Sorted
in alphabetical order.>
Delurking to say that actually it isn't a mistake in the Bloomsbury
edition. In that edition, after Harry's own sorting he walks to the
Gryffindor table, sits down, and starts observing the teachers.
("Harry sat down opposite the ghost in the ruff...He could see the
High Table properly now. At the end nearest him sat Hagrid...in the
centre...sat Albus Dumbledore...Harry spotted Professor Quirrell,
too..."etc.) It's not stated directly, but the implication is that
more people are being sorted while he's doing this.
After all of this is the quote in question, "there were only three
people left to be sorted" (Lisa Turpin, Ron, and Blaise Zabini). The
Scolastic edition would be fine if only the the editor had inserted
Dean before that quote, or changed the three to a four.
Re-lurking now.
Dessie, who didn't want the hardworking Bloomsbury editors to be
thought badly of (yes, I know that's terrible grammar).
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive