It's possible there ISN'T an Heir of Gryffindor and other matters
darrin_burnett
bard7696 at aol.com
Wed May 21 04:25:44 UTC 2003
No: HPFGUIDX 58325
Corinth:
> > Longbottoms? Fawcetts? Boneses?
>
> The Longbottoms were tortured by his supporters, while Voldemort was
> in no condition to instruct them. The Death Eaters have their own
> motivations for their actions, not necessarily consistant with
> Voldemort's ideas. We know nothing about the Fawcetts and Boneses,
> other than that they were victims. That said, I never said
Voldemort opposed killing purebloods. Voldemort killed pureblood
wizards, but these wizards were standing in the way of his ultimate
goal: to create a pureblood magic community. His ideal could never
exist if there were these silly people clinging to Muggle sympathies.
>
To further bolster what you're saying, Corinth, let us also remember
that the Longbottoms were among the best Aurors in the Ministry. Pure
revenge and/or survival instinct could have motivated the DEs taking
them out.
I seem to remember Neville talking about all his family being magic,
but we don't know anything about the Fawcetts or Boneses and whether
they are pureblood or not.
I think Draco said it best when he talked about "Mudbloods and Muggle-
Lovers" being the first and specifically mentioned the Weasleys, one
of the oldest pureblood families going.
Lest there is a desire to write off Draco as being a stupid kid,
remember that he learned at the feet of Lucius, who was one of V-
Mort's top guys.
V-Mort would consider any pureblood who opposed him as being unworthy
of the very blood in his or her veins.
Darrin
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive