Graduate: Re: British culture viewed through the Potterverse
Ali
Ali at zymurgy.org
Thu May 22 21:26:42 UTC 2003
No: HPFGUIDX 58472
Ali wrote:
I never cease to cringe when posters mention Harry's
graduation; British kids don't graduate from school, so if
Harry graduates from Hogwarts that will be another first!
bboy_mn:
There is graduation then again there is graduation which are not
necessarily the same.
In the other sense of the word, graduation is the SUCCESSFUL
completion of a particular stage of schooling.
<Snip>
So in Britain, if nothing else, your grades or the certification of
your achievements on and successful completion of the GCSE's and
the A-Levels are your graduation. That is, the SUCCESSFUL certified
end of that stage or your education. In that sense, ceremony or no
ceremony,I have to assume the British students do graduate.
Pip!Squeak:
No, they don't! The whole problem is that the word 'graduate'
means different things in British English and American English.
That is why the way U.S. readers use the word often makes British
readers wince. They're using a construction that is perfectly
correct in U.S. English and completely wrong in British English.
SNIP
But. We. Do. Not. Graduate. From. Secondary. School.
It's just one of those 'two countries separated by a common
language' things. 'Graduate' no longer has the same meaning in both
countries.
Ali again:
I agree with everything that Pip said. However, to me, it is not
simply that the words have different meanings. I would never use the
word "alumini" for ex-school students. That is a word that is also
only used for graduates of a university. If I had to call ex-
Hogwarts students anything, I might call them "Old-Hogwartians".
However, the usage can be tranferred over to ex-Hogwarts students
with ease as they are the same in the US or Britain, whatever name
we choose to give them.
In Britain there is no equivalent of a successful completion of
studies at school. We move up a year whether we have been
outstandingly successful or can't read or write (usually). There is
no set level at GSCE or A'Level over which you can be judged to have
successfully completed your schooling (Although schools are judged
on how many kids get 5 or more GCSEs). If Hermione gets 12 OWLS she
will undoubtedly have been very successful, if she gets say 5 grade
A NEWTS, she will have passed with flying colours (assuming they
work in a similar way to A'Levels). However, there is no prescribed
number of A'Levels to prove your success. 1 or 4 might be needed for
the school-leaver: it depends.
I think it is this that is the problem: our lack of standardisation.
Someone might get 9 GCSEs, but have failed maths. Would they have
successfully completed that stage of their education or not?
Applying that to Hogwarts, it is possible that Harry will pass all
his OWLs, but fail Potions. Given that Potions appears to be very
important, has he graduated from that stage or not? In the British
system he could still move on, and perhaps retake that exam at a
later date if he felt so inclined. However, as I would use the
word "graduate", it would mean achieving a minimum acceptable
standard in a predetermined range of subjects. It is this that does
not happen in British schools.
Ali
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive