the term "professor" and titles in general (was: Snape's

pengolodh_sc pengolodh_sc at yahoo.no
Sun May 25 00:38:02 UTC 2003


No: HPFGUIDX 58602

--- In HPforGrownups, eloiseherisson wrote:
Odile wrote:
> >Back to res Harrius Pottericus, why is it that some
> >female teachers are addressed as "Madame" (Madame
> >Pomfrey, Madame Hooch) and some are addressed as
> >"Professor" (Professor McGonagall)? I know that this
> >is (probably) movie contamination, but I always
> >wondered about it because in film version of CoS,
> >Dumbledore addresses Sprout as both Madame and
> >Professor. They're not interchangeable, are they? Is
> >"Madame" an honorific?
> 
> Eloise:
> I hadn't noticed that in the movie.
> IIRC, the only two females *at Hogwarts* regularly addressed as
> Madam are Madam Hooch and Madam Pomfrey. I assume this is
> because neither of them is a teacher of an *academic* subject
> (Madam Pomfrey isn't a teacher at all). Although sports science
> is treated as an academic subject in the Muggle world, I think 
> the WW is too old-fashioned for that.

I think perhaps the distinction is whether they by virtue of their 
positions conduct a final examination of students or not.  I do not 
recall there ever being mentioned anything about passing flying, only 
that you needed to take (survive) the class - and apparently only in 
first year.  Otherwise her role seems to be supervising Quidditch.  
With Madams Pomfrey and Pince there would be no examinations anyway, 
of course.

[snip]

> But in the Potterverse, it seems that "Madam" is a respectful
> form of address for an adult witch.
> 
> So why not Madam Weasley I hear you all clamour?
> Good question. Which leads me to think that perhaps it's the
> title used by "professional" women (other than teaching
> academics)

I do like this thought.

> Odile:
> >And while I'm at it, why is Voldemort a "Lord," yet
> >the seemingly aristocratic Malfoy is "Mister"? Or is
> >that movie contamination as well?

[snip]

> OTOH, Dumbledore uses it and Snape, amongst others, talks of
> the Dark Lord. We *assume* that Malfoy is aritstocratic from
> his name, his wealth and the fact that he lives in a manor
> named after his family.
> 
> I wonder, though if in the WW, there aren't *titles* as such.
> Not the kind of inherited titles that we have. 
> What about Nearly Headless Nick? The Bloody Baron? Sir Properly 
> Decapitated-Podmore, then?
> No probs! These are *Muggle* titles inherited by those who just
> happened also to be wizards. 

Well, the title "Sir" is, with exception of baronets, not 
inheritable, and I do believe beheadings had ceased being common by 
the time baronetcies were commonly handed out (well, sold - £1095, 
the same sum required to keep a force of 30 infantrymen in Ulster for 
three years; useful way for the Crown to raise money for the army!).  
Wizards might well have given such services to Crown and Country that 
knighthoods or peerages may have been thought a suitable reward.

Also, I do not believe we know that the Malfoys live in a manor, much 
less that it is called Malfoy Manor - it is common enough in fanfics, 
but as I recall, it comes from Harry in one of the books thinking 
somewhat derisively about Draco probably living in some large manor, 
with servants to both hands, and so on - and Harry did not assume a 
name, as such.  Incidentally, if the home of the Malfoys is actually 
a proper manor (a property which holds certain feudal rights), and 
has been in the possession of the Malfoy-family for the duration of 
the existance of Malfoys, they may well hold that to be much more 
honourable than any "new" title.

Best regards
Christian Stubø





More information about the HPforGrownups archive