Wizard government (was wizards and the queen)
queen_astrofiammante
mail at chartfield.net
Sat Nov 1 20:13:39 UTC 2003
No: HPFGUIDX 83949
lola says:
> why then has the magical Prime Minister not been mentioned? And why
does Fudge have the title Minister of Magic, which gives him power
over all magical affairs?
Now Astrofiammante:
Something has struck me before about the system of government in the
magical world, of which this thread reminded me.
In the UK, and probably everywhere else with a similar system of
government, for the protection of democracy and other essential
stuff, government is supposed to be divided into three distinct
branches:
Legislature (parliament; lawmakers)
Executive (government; prime minister, cabinet)
Judiciary (court system; judges)
Each of these three branches should act as a check and balance on the
others - for example people have access to the courts to challenge
laws they think unjust.
Without straying too far into politics, an issue people have with the
present UK government (and probably the US one) is that it is
upsetting this natural distinction and that the executive currently
has too much influence over the legislature and the judiciary.
In the magical world, we've seen plenty about the executive - the
Ministry of Magic is a big sprawling beast with practically unlimited
influence.
We've seen a little of the judiciary in the form of the Wizengamot.
Doesn't it strike you how dominated it is by the executive? Amelia
Bones is a 'good guy' in OotP, but she is an official. Fudge,
Umbridge - officials. And this is nothing new - Barty Crouch, an
official, was able to send Sirius Black to Azkaban without a trial.
And have we seen anything of the legislature? Could it be one of
the 'grand council of wizard' bodies to which Dumbledore belongs? Or
has anyone got any better suggestions? In any case, it hardly strikes
me as a dominant feature of wizard government. Who is originating the
laws? Fudge? In which case he's more or less a dictator, benevolent
or otherwise.
So we have a system depicted where the executive - the Ministry of
Magic - has none of the checks and balances operating on it that
should be there, if we want to draw parallels with our own Muggle
world.
And we've seen some of the problems this can cause - when the
Ministry starts acting beyond its powers - Umbridge's behaviour at
Hogwarts and by sending the Dementors to Little Whinging, Fudge's
outrageous attempts to convict Harry wrongly of illegally using
magic, the lack of a completely free press in the form of a Daily
Prophet that can be unduly influenced by the Ministry.
To return to Lola's point at the top of this post, cabinet government
is supposed to provide another set of checks and balances. The Prime
Minister is merely 'first among equals' and decisions are collective.
If Fudge is operating in an ambiguous relationship to the 'Muggle
cabinet', than that's another set of checks and balances on his
behaviour gone. For goodness' sake, the man's more or less being
invited to misbehave himself.
I think all this is just another of many examples of how wizarding
society is badly out of kilter, and will need to be reformed before
the end of the series - if another Evil Overlord isn't to happen by
and upset everything all over again...
Astrofiammante
www.deadjournal.com/users/astrofiammante
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive