Fidelius (Re: Chapter Discussions: Chapter 4, Number Twelve, Grimmauld Place)
pippin_999
foxmoth at qnet.com
Sat Nov 1 22:00:19 UTC 2003
No: HPFGUIDX 83954
--- In HPforGrownups at yahoogroups.com, "cubfanbudwoman"
<susiequsie23 at s...> wrote:
> > Gorda:
> >It raises the question about Godric's Hollow: presumably
Peter had
> > told Sirius where to find the Potters, because when he finds
> >Peter's place empty he gets a bad feeling and goes looking
for the
> >Potters.
>
> Then KathyK:
> > Just some random comments on who I think was told.
Sirius obviously knew. It was his idea to change to Peter, he
was keeping and eye on Peter, and Sirius and James would
have wanted Sirius to be in the know. Besides, if Peter didn't tell
Sirius, it would have drawn suspicion to him.
>
Sirlusly Snapey Susan
> Now me:
> I may just be being dense here [that has certainly happened
here before!], but I thought the whole reason for Sirius's
suggesting Peter as SecretKeeper was that he [Sirius] DIDN'T
want to be in the know. He'd said he would have been too
obvious a choice for that, right? So if Peter told Sirius *anyway*,
then what's the point of using Peter? <<
It seems that people who know the secret, but aren't themselves
the secretkeeper, can't reveal it to anybody else. Dumbledore
says that because Kreacher is not Secret Keeper for the Order,
he can't reveal where the headquarters is.
Judging by what Flitwick said, even if Sirius took Voldemort right
up to the Potters' window, Voldemort still wouldn't be able to see
them, or even realize that they were there. Only Peter could give
them away. But once the house was destroyed, it no longer
exisited and the spell couldn't hide it anymore.
I would guess that Dumbledore and Sirius were both let in on
the secret by Peter (though Dumbledore thought it was Sirius),
but couldn't themselves reveal it to anyone else.
Pippin
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive