Further analysis of Luna Lovegood
dan
darkthirty at shaw.ca
Sat Nov 8 22:36:09 UTC 2003
No: HPFGUIDX 84409
To summarize my points so far -
Lovegood is not suspicious by nature, nor does she display a penchant
for decoding, but rather an obsession with, and unquestioning belief
in the validity of, her father's newspaper and anything in it.
Lovegood is not particularly a "seer," at least not anymore than
Potter is. The same goes for speculations regarding Luna's (and
Harry's) non-human origins, her species, as it were.
Lovegood gets as much validation of her experiences from Potter as he
does from her. This mutual validation is assailable, if sweet.
Potter's heroic is from the heart, rather than from the intellect.
Lovegood's "spaciness" and apparent equanimity may be more or less
faulty mechanisms for dealing with her mother's death 6 years before.
The scene at the end of OOP is a breath of fresh air, for the
readers, for Potter, and, I submit, for Lovegood. I refer to it as an
opening, preparing the stage for the send-off by the Order, but
prepared for, by Potter, at the lake, with a sit down without which
the interaction with Lovegood could not have taken place.
The fact that Luna was not mentioned as being on the train at the end
of the school year is significant.
Now, for the new stuff.
Melanie describes Potter's hurt at learning the fallability, the
mistakes, of his father and god-father, a kind of betrayal of his
inner fantasy. In a sense, Lovegood supplies a method by which a
fallable ideal (her mother) can be clung to - a level of acceptance.
But, concommitantly, she finds that, in order to sustain this
equanimity, she must remain open to fantastical beliefs, some of
which will be, inevitably (since they can't be disproven, entirely)
seemingly validated. What Lovegood does get validation of on a more
important level, in OOP, is of her competance as a witch.
Annemehr states that she assumes that Lovegood has stability and love
in her family. We are not told much about her father, though. I'm not
sure what her home life would be like. On one hand, the thorough
belief in what her father prints might indicate unfulfilled longing
for that "acceptance," or on the other a genuine
closeness/love/respect/agreement. The telling thing is that she
clings to the Quibbler like a security blanket. I agree that there is
something "definitely wrong" with all of us. But in terms of the
books, I want to deepen the analysis of Lovegood, precisely because
she is such a breath of fresh air and precisely because I am so taken
with her character. In one way, I feel like there are really only two
Real World, as it were, characters in the book - Harry (insofar as he
is not Rowling) and Luna. This comes from the questions I asked - why
was she introduced, given a chapter, and given the penultimate scene
with Potter? Rowling needed her, so I am wondering exactly why? And I
am assuming it is because the resolution (the liberation) requires
someone from outside the fantasy world of Potter - someone who (in
book terms, for the character Harry Potter) serves the same function
as the boy in closet (in RW terms) served for Rowling.
I don't have much thought about Lovegood ushering in, or being part
of ushering in, a period of House unity, but perhaps showing the way
to a "houseless" Hogwarts.
To Paula, I would add this -
Analysis on this level can certainly aid one in decyphering plot
development and devices, in much the same way Lovegood's example of
equanimity aids Potter.
Concluding then -
Luna's role as agent for Harry's development needs to be analysized
from her perspective as well, if she is to be more than "a plot
device" herself. Because of the issues her beliefs, her spaciness,
bring up, it is perhaps too easy to "accept" what she is at face
value. Almost as if her role as friend to Potter is her entire raison
d'etre. A paucity of serious theory regarding Luna the witch, the
absence of any anagrammed theory especially, such that she cannot
participate in the WitchWizard Wrestling Federation, for example,
indicate to me that listees haven't fully let her into the story. The
strange lack of interest by most regarding her absence on the train
(she was probably with other Ravenclaws, someone even said) is a good
example of this.
One thought, too, that interests me is that Rowling probably won't
leave the Nargles/mistletoe thing just hanging there.
I am thinking of these, for example.
LLL - L3 League of Luna Lovers
LLLL - L4 League of Loony Luna Lovers
LLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL - L16 Loving Literature, Loving Life; League of
Loony Luna Lovers Lifts Luminous Laughing Lass, Leitmotif of Light,
to Latitudes of Legend
dan (owner and advocate of L 3, 4 and 16, if they ever exist)
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive