[HPforGrownups] Re: why only James had to die
MadameSSnape at aol.com
MadameSSnape at aol.com
Mon Oct 6 01:17:19 UTC 2003
No: HPFGUIDX 82331
In a message dated 10/5/2003 8:45:19 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
sevenhundredandthirteen at yahoo.com writes:
Actually, the prophecy never says that it's *James and Lily's* child.
All it says is that parents had defied the Dark Lord thrice. And,
when you think about it, if Voldemort had killed Harry then James and
Lily would no longer fulfill the prophecy any more. If they survive
the attack on the Potter residence they have now defied the Dark Lord
*four* times. So, even if they did survive and have another baby it
wouldn't fulfill the prophecy- it would be a child born to those who
had defied the Dark Lord *four* times, not the three times why the
prophecy speaks of.
Sherrie (that's me) adds:
Additionally, the prophecy specifies that it would be a child born at a
specific time - so any child born at any time other than the end of July, 1980,
wouldn't qualify to fulfill it. It had to be either Harry or Neville - and for
whatever reason, Voldemort decided it was Harry.
Sherrie
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive