Neville's Role in Books Six/Seven
celebrimborcormacolindor
henning2 at terra.com.br
Wed Oct 8 16:10:46 UTC 2003
No: HPFGUIDX 82542
I have something to say about Neville Longbottom and his role in the
Harry Potter series. I never paid any special attention to Neville
until recently. In fact, my interest in Neville started when I read
Chapter 37 of OoP, when Dumbledore is talking to Harry about the
prophecy and says:
"Sybill's prophecy could have applied to two wizard boys, both born
at the end of July that year, both of whom had parents in the Order
of the Phoenix, both sets of parents having narrowly escaped
Voldemort three times. One, of course, was you. The other was Neville
Longbottom."
I think this text is *surprising*, as it suggests a similitude
between Harry and Neville. Remember, the Sorting Hat took a good time
before make Neville a Gryffindor (SS/PS 07) and he fell from the
broom the first time he tried to fly (SS/SP 09); he tried to stop
Harry, Hermione and Ron when they went after the Philosopher's Stone
and, as result, he was jinxed by Hermione (SS/SP 16); Minerva
McGonagall called him "abysmally foolish" because he wrote down all
the passwords for the week and then lost the paper, allowing Sirius
Black to enter Gryffindor Tower (PoA 13); and so on. Neville combines
good intentions with laughable and sometimes shameful mistakes. In
his clumsiness he is the typical antihero, as much as the brave and
resourceful Harry is the typical hero. So, it is certainly surprising
to suggest that Neville (and not Harry) could be the hero.
But this is not only surprising; it is also *gratuitous*. The author
had no need whatsoever to invent this similitude between Harry and
Neville, which is neither necessary, nor useful to resolve any
mystery or to explain any piece of the story until now. If Voldemort
had attacked Neville in one of the early books, then would make sense
to write the passage cited above (Chapter 37 of OoP) to justify the
mistake of the villain in recognizing the hero. But as far as I know
there is nothing like this in the first books, nothing that suggests
the need to assimilate Harry and Neville.
Once I read the passage cited above, I started to think about
Neville, who Dumbledore says can be a true hero. What is the role of
Neville in the story till now? What were his actions? What difference
has he made to the events that have occurred in the Harry Potter
series? And the more I thought, the more I realized that *until now
Neville had no role in the conflict*. The important facts happen with
(or come from) Harry, Hermione, Ron, Dumbledore, Snape, Hagrid,
Sirius; but not with (or from) Neville. In fact, it's entirely
possible to tell the tale of Harry Potter without mention Neville or
his actions. From this point of view he is much like any other
classmate of Harry, let's say, Seamus Finnigan or Dean Thomas: not a
star, not even a supporting role, just an extra. He may be a
sympathetic extra, but no more than this.
But once I realized that Neville was an extra, I immediately realized
that he is a strange extra, because *JKR spent a lot of her time on
him.* She introduced Neville very early in the series (SS/PS 06); in
fact, he appeared before Hermione. From that point on, JKR never
missed a chance to tell us about him: he often loses his toad (SS/PS
06), he lives with his grandmother (SS/SP 07), he is short (SS/SP
07), he made a mistake in his first Potions class (SS/SP 08), he
forgets the password to the Gryffindor Tower (SS/SP 09) and so on.
Neville is a conspicuous extra who frequently appears in the
narrative despite his unimportant role.
Well, if JKR put so much time in Neville, making efforts to tell us
about his personality and his background, it must be because *Neville
will have an important role in the story*, a role that JKR has been
planning since SS/SP. From *this* point of view we can understand our
conspicuous extra: since the beginning his character has been
prepared for great things, things that haven't happened yet (that's
why he appears to be an extra), things that will happen in book six
and/or book seven. And that is my fundamental thesis: Neville will be
an important character in book six and/or book seven, much more
important than he is until now.
Now, the precise role of Neville in the future books remains open to
speculation. But I must say that *I don't think Neville is the hero*.
First, because he is the typical antihero, as I stated above, and,
second, because Dumbledore said the prophecy is about Harry (OoP 37),
and Dumbledore is the alter ego of JK Rowling, acting and appearing
as someone who knows all, who possesses full knowledge about any
fact, about the past, the present and the future. It would be foul
play to put lies in his lips to deceive the reader.
Having said that, I must add that *I bet the future role of Neville
is connected to the prophecy*, with the canon cited above, which
states that the prophecy could be applied to him. In fact, I think
the similitude between Harry and Neville looks gratuitous precisely
because it is the first part of a story that hasn't been told yet, a
story that will appear in books six/seven. In book five the
similitude is detached and looks gratuitous because it is waiting for
the future books, when it will have full sense. Maybe someone
(Voldemort? Death Eaters? Fudge? Snape?) will think Neville is the
true hero; maybe Neville has some magical link to Harry, a link that
explains the similitude between them; maybe Neville had been attacked
in the past; maybe there is a link that connects the similitude
between Harry and Neville and Voldemort's attack on Neville's
parents. But, in any case, I think the applicability of the prophecy
to both Harry and Neville will play an important part in the story.
Fernando Henning (with Manya Elf's help)
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive