Reading too much into... [WAS: James & Lilly Happy Couple?]
cubfanbudwoman
susiequsie23 at sbcglobal.net
Thu Oct 9 20:27:47 UTC 2003
No: HPFGUIDX 82624
--- In HPforGrownups at yahoogroups.com, "Richard" <darkmatter30 at y...>
wrote:
>
> I think you are reading too much into this passage.
<SNIP>
> This all raises an interesting point, which is one of exegesis. It
> is all to easy for one to read things into a text, rather than simply
> reading out of the text what is there. I've seen a great deal of the
> former, round these parts, often leading to theories that are at odds
> with canon. JKR doesn't help matters by so consistently dropping
> little clues that cannot be fully appreciated except in retrospect,
> but that doesn't change my belief that some of us (perhaps all of us,
> at times, myself included) need to exercise a bit more circumspection
> when trying to analyze Potterian canon.
>
> It seems as if some readers are too tightly wound into the story, and
> their opinions of how it should develop, rather than treating it as I
> think it should be, which is as a very good story, to be read so that
> it unfolds itself, rather than being in any sense required to unfold
> according our personal expectations. Given JKR's ability to keep us
> all surprised, I think it best to let her write the end of this tale
> as she sees fit, rather than entrenching ourselves in opinions that
> may prove at odds with the tale itself.
>
> So, back to the point, if James and Lily are a happy couple ... or
> not ... let's allow JKR to tell us in the fullness of the tales
> time ... or not. If it matters she'll tell us, if not, she likely
> won't. But, it is her tale, after all.
Bravo!!!! How wonderfully said!
Doubtless, you will take a lot of grief from people, saying "Why are
you here, then, if you don't want to engage in the fun of speculation
and theorizing?" But I think you are right. These are JKR's
stories, and sometimes people need to lighten up a bit and let her
story come to *its own* conclusions!
Sometimes people seem to forget that JKR is a human being--an author,
yes, and one who takes great care with her work--but a human being
nonetheless, who probably does not labor over *every* single word and
how fans might read them...and who probably [gasp!] makes an error or
two in terms of consistency or logic in her magical world. I say, so
what!? It's a fun story with delightful characters, and while I get
a kick out of considering possibilities in the future or what various
things might have meant, I do not think it makes sense to belabor
**tiny** bits of word usage or **minutiae** in an effort to
gain "evidence" for theories. It's a judgment call, of course, over
how far is too far, but there are times it's pretty clear someone's
really grasping at straws in the text.
Note to the original James & Lily poster: I'm not saying YOU went
ridiculously far in your argument, which is why I snipped out your
post; I'm simply responding to Richard's general comments.
Siriusly Snapey Susan
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive