Hermionie and house elves
laura
strikethepose_vouge at yahoo.co.uk
Sun Oct 19 14:06:13 UTC 2003
No: HPFGUIDX 83138
"she pulled out two misshapen woolly objects, placed them carefuly on
a table then covered them with a few screwed-up bits of parchment and
a broken quill and stood back to admire the effect...
'They're hats for the house - elves'...
OOP p230
Hermione is pretty obsessed with obtaining rights for the house-
elves, but something struck me as I was re-reading OOP last night.
Does Hermione have the right to give the Hogwarts house - elves
clothes? Surely Dumbledore is their master?
In GOF:
"'Can't house-elves speak their minds about their master, then?'
Harry asked
'Oh, no, sir, no,' said Dobby, looking suddenly serious. 'Tis part of
the house-elvs enslavement, sir. We keeps their secrets and our
silence, sir, we upholds the family's honour and we never speaks ill
of them - though Professor Dumbledore told Dobby he does not insist
on this'"...
Dobby certainly considers Dumbledore to be his master, so it can be
extrapolated that the other elves feel similarly.
The question is, can house -elves be freed by anyone giving them
clothes? IMO no - otherwise Harry could just have given Dobby a sock
at any random time in COS to free him.
Another question - do the house - elves at Hogwarst consider the
students to be their masters? I would say no, otherwise they would
have been mentioned in the passage above.
Thus, I would say that it would be only Dumbledore ( or at least one
of the teachers) who could free a house - elf. So why does Hermione
think that she can free them?
I think that it is arrogant of Hermione to assume that she is the
master of any house - elf, and has the right to assume such power
over any sentient being. Although she is really the only character
to be seen standing up for the elves, she is, in her own way, almost
as bad as Lucius Malfoy, who thinks that Dobby has no mind of his own.
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive