twins first year beaters??

[evil_sushi2003]

No: HPFGUIDX 83677

A point which I have always thought undisputed was that Fred and 
George W were a year older than H/Hr/R et all. (Well, a yr above 
them in schooling terms anyway). In PS/SS I took it to mean that 
Harry was the youngest quidditch player in ages- a 1st yr. But, at 
the beginning of PS/SS I'm pretty sure that R tells H that F/G were 
beaters for the Gryf team 'last year'- wouldn't this be their 1st 
yr, hence arguing that Harry was not the youngest quidditch player?

I could see ways in which F and G could be 1st yr beaters whilst 
Harry could still be the youngest, although this is talking a matter 
of months, and we all know that Harry's b-day is in July, so that 
doesn't leave much room for a large age-gap, and I would presume 
that this age-gap would be much cause for celebration (eg. Harry is 
the youngest in AGES) and so forth.

OTOH Harry may be the youngest SEEKER- and the youngest of that 
particular position.

OR... I could have just confused myself a whole lot, and be speaking 
(not litterally) utter nonsense... hmmm, the possibilies...

evil_sushi